Evaluation of the Jurisprudential Principles of Civil Responsibility

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Hooshmand Firoozabadi Hussein

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: CIVIL JURISPRUDENCE DOCTRINES Year:2019 | Volume:- | Issue:19 Page(s): 297-328

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

2,187

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Evaluation of the Jurisprudential Principles of Civil Responsibility

Author(s)

Hooshmand Firoozabadi Hussein | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Customary invokingQ1

LiabilityQ2

RespectQ1

Positive ruleQ1

Imperative ruleQ1

KinsmanQ2

The basis of civil responsibilityQ1

Abstract

the two jurisprudential principles that proposed as The basis of civil responsibility are: Customary invoking of the harm to the damaging and Respecting of victim. The question is, which of these jurisprudential foundations can justify the Liability which is a Positive rule and the basis of civil Liability? By not accepting the opinion of those who considered the Liability of the Kinsman as a Positive rule and considered it to be annulling of the theory of the Customary invoking, this article has emphasized on Imperative rule of the Liability of the Kinsman. The reason for not accepting the theory of Customary invoking as the basis is the lack of providing a positive criterion and standard and confusion between The basis of civil responsibility and one of its pillars (causality relation). In the following, by examining the traditional arguments of the Respect, the extraction of the Positive rule of Liability from the verses such as “ the unlawful ownership” and the narratives such as “ the relevance of the believer’ s property is the same as his blood” is a perfect argument. By proving the domain of the theory of Respect for physical, financial and spiritual damage to Muslims and non-Muslims, “ Respect” has been accepted as a jurisprudential basis for civil responsibility.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Hooshmand Firoozabadi, Hussein. (2019). Evaluation of the Jurisprudential Principles of Civil Responsibility. CIVIL JURISPRUDENCE DOCTRINES, -(19 ), 297-328. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/227219/en

Vancouver: Copy

Hooshmand Firoozabadi Hussein. Evaluation of the Jurisprudential Principles of Civil Responsibility. CIVIL JURISPRUDENCE DOCTRINES[Internet]. 2019;-(19 ):297-328. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/227219/en

IEEE: Copy

Hussein Hooshmand Firoozabadi, “Evaluation of the Jurisprudential Principles of Civil Responsibility,” CIVIL JURISPRUDENCE DOCTRINES, vol. -, no. 19 , pp. 297–328, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/227219/en

Related Journal Papers