مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

2,779
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON OF GEOLOGY AND GEOMORPHOLOGY METHODS FOR SOIL SCIENCE STUDIES IN NATURAL RESOURCES

Pages

  15-24

Abstract

 Soil science studies, base of most natural resources research, are of high expenses due to the large number of profiles needed for evaluation of soil properties. So we need methods through which one can evaluate soil characteristics while, using a low number of profiles. Tow common soil studying methods, GEOLOGY and GEOMORPHOLOGY, were compared in Hassanjoon sub-catchment of Taleghan drainage basin, located in 50° 37' to 50°50' longitude and 36° 7' to 36° 20' latitude with high geological as well as geomorphological variations. Initially a map of geomorphological and geological units was prepared through photoGEOLOGY and field checks using geomorphologic information system of 1:20000 scale. Then were made 60 profiles from which soil samples were taken for physical as well as chemical analysis in which pH, EC, %OM , % CaC03, %silt , %sand and %clay were determined.Results indicate that geological units are not homogenous so that the profiles located at facies in each lithologic unit are of high significant difference (except for pH). So it is necessary to separate facies in each lithological unit. The profiles made in different slopes in each facies were not of a significant difference, and on the other hand, using a high number of profiles didn't add to the accuracy of the study. So geomorphological method (separating facies in lithologhic units) is a more efficient one than geological meihod for SOIL STUDIES in natural resources, in climates similar to the one in this study.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    JAFARI, M., SARMADIAN, F., MOEINI, A., SALAJEGHEH, A., & FEYZNIA, S.. (2005). A COMPARISON OF GEOLOGY AND GEOMORPHOLOGY METHODS FOR SOIL SCIENCE STUDIES IN NATURAL RESOURCES. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 58(1), 15-24. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/22798/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    JAFARI M., SARMADIAN F., MOEINI A., SALAJEGHEH A., FEYZNIA S.. A COMPARISON OF GEOLOGY AND GEOMORPHOLOGY METHODS FOR SOIL SCIENCE STUDIES IN NATURAL RESOURCES. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES[Internet]. 2005;58(1):15-24. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/22798/en

    IEEE: Copy

    M. JAFARI, F. SARMADIAN, A. MOEINI, A. SALAJEGHEH, and S. FEYZNIA, “A COMPARISON OF GEOLOGY AND GEOMORPHOLOGY METHODS FOR SOIL SCIENCE STUDIES IN NATURAL RESOURCES,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 15–24, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/22798/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button