مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

841
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF ABSTRACTS APPEARING IN THE FIRST AND SECOND AEROSPACE AND SUBMARINE MEDICINE CONGRESS

Pages

  27-34

Abstract

 Background: Seminars and CONGRESSes provide an academic atmosphere to present unpublished data and new scientific achievements. In this regard, assessing the quality of such academic events can play an important role in developing their scientific values and identifying their weaknesses.Materials and methods: In this descriptive, cross-sectional study, the abstracts of the two recently held AEROSPACE AND SUBMARINE MEDICINE CONGRESSes were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.Results: Results showed that the majority of the presented articles (about 90%) were review articles and only about 10% of contributors had submitted original research studies. In addition, the affiliation of the corresponding author in most articles was AJA University of Medical Sciences (64% and 86.7% in the first and the second CONGRESS, respectively). Toxicity and occupational medicine were the most frequent subjects (40% and 28.2%, respectively).Conclusion: The results indicated that the quality of abstracts presented in both CONGRESSes was not satisfactory. It seems necessary to find a proper strategy to improve the scientific and research quality of such events in future.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    JAHANBAKHSH, Z., & NEZAMI ASL, A.. (2013). QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF ABSTRACTS APPEARING IN THE FIRST AND SECOND AEROSPACE AND SUBMARINE MEDICINE CONGRESS. EBNESINA, 15(3 (44)), 27-34. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/228604/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    JAHANBAKHSH Z., NEZAMI ASL A.. QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF ABSTRACTS APPEARING IN THE FIRST AND SECOND AEROSPACE AND SUBMARINE MEDICINE CONGRESS. EBNESINA[Internet]. 2013;15(3 (44)):27-34. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/228604/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Z. JAHANBAKHSH, and A. NEZAMI ASL, “QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF ABSTRACTS APPEARING IN THE FIRST AND SECOND AEROSPACE AND SUBMARINE MEDICINE CONGRESS,” EBNESINA, vol. 15, no. 3 (44), pp. 27–34, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/228604/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button