مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,048
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT BETWEEN WEIGHTS-OF-EVIDENCE AND FREQUENCY RATIO MODELS FOR LANDSLIDE HAZARD ZONATION IN VANAK BASIN

Pages

  147-160

Abstract

 In this study, Vanak catchment because of high sensitivity to LANDSLIDE was selected. Then with geological, topographic maps and field survey, LANDSLIDE hazard map was prepared using GPS as dependent variables. A total of 110 LANDSLIDEs were mapped in GIS out of which 77 (70%) locations were chosen for the modeling purpose and the remaining 33 (30%) points were used for the model validation. Then layers of the LANDSLIDE conditioning factors including slope degree, slope aspect, plan curvature, altitude, lithology, land use, distance of road, distance of fault, distance of drainage, drainage density, topographic wetness index (TWI) and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) Calculated. The relationship between the predisposing factors and the LANDSLIDEs were calculated using WEIGHTS-OF-EVIDENCE and FREQUENCY RATIO MODELs. Finally, the susceptibility map was classified into five susceptibility classes: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. In order to verification, the results were compared with LANDSLIDEs which were not used during the training of the models. Subsequently, the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn and the area under curves (AUC) were calculated for LANDSLIDE susceptibility maps. Results obtained from validation showed that AUC for Frequency Ratio and WEIGHTS-OF-EVIDENCE models are 0.917 (91.7%) and 0.890 (89.0%), Therefore, the results revealed that the FREQUENCY RATIO MODEL is more suitable than the WEIGHTS-OF-EVIDENCE model. Finally, verification indicates satisfactory agreement between resulted susceptibility map and existing data on LANDSLIDE location.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    ARABAMERI, ALIREZA, SHIRANI, KUOROSH, & REZAEEI, KHALIL. (2017). A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT BETWEEN WEIGHTS-OF-EVIDENCE AND FREQUENCY RATIO MODELS FOR LANDSLIDE HAZARD ZONATION IN VANAK BASIN. JOURNAL OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 8(15), 147-160. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/230384/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ARABAMERI ALIREZA, SHIRANI KUOROSH, REZAEEI KHALIL. A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT BETWEEN WEIGHTS-OF-EVIDENCE AND FREQUENCY RATIO MODELS FOR LANDSLIDE HAZARD ZONATION IN VANAK BASIN. JOURNAL OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT RESEARCH[Internet]. 2017;8(15):147-160. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/230384/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ALIREZA ARABAMERI, KUOROSH SHIRANI, and KHALIL REZAEEI, “A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT BETWEEN WEIGHTS-OF-EVIDENCE AND FREQUENCY RATIO MODELS FOR LANDSLIDE HAZARD ZONATION IN VANAK BASIN,” JOURNAL OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, vol. 8, no. 15, pp. 147–160, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/230384/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button