SURVEY OF THE RELATIONS BETWEEN THREE THESES OF QUINE'S

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOVAHED ZIA; SHAQAQI HOSEIN

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL RESEARCH (AFAGHE HEKMAT) Year:2016 | Volume:4 | Issue:2 (10) Page(s): 7-32

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

877

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

SURVEY OF THE RELATIONS BETWEEN THREE THESES OF QUINE'S "TWO DOGMAS"

Author(s)

MOVAHED ZIA | SHAQAQI HOSEIN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EPISTEMOLOGICAL HOLISMQ2

MEANING HOLISMQ2

REJECTION OF THE NALYTIC-SYNTHETIC DISTINCTIONQ2

MEANING ATOMISMQ2

Abstract

This article is focused on Quine's "Two dogmas of empiricism". We discuss about his holism. His holism has two aspects: EPISTEMOLOGICAL HOLISM (EH) and MEANING HOLISM (MH). The third thesis that we discuss about is "Rejection of the analytic–synthetic distinction" (RASD). Fodor & Lepore (1993) have not opposed EH and RASD, but they claim:a) RASD is a premise for EH argument.b) Although Quine's EH is regarded as a premise for his MH argument, but this argument is not defensible.On the other hand, Okasha (2000) and Becker (2001) show:(a) Quine's EH is a premise for his RASD argument.(b) The inference of MH from EH is defensible.At this article: (a) both claims of Fodor and Lepore, have been rejected and defended of the claims of Okasha and Becker, and (b) added a claim: RASD and MH (the both is based on EH) are the same, in fact, they are one thesis.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOVAHED, ZIA, & SHAQAQI, HOSEIN. (2016). SURVEY OF THE RELATIONS BETWEEN THREE THESES OF QUINE'S "TWO DOGMAS". THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL RESEARCH (AFAGHE HEKMAT), 4(2 (10)), 7-32. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/232746/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOVAHED ZIA, SHAQAQI HOSEIN. SURVEY OF THE RELATIONS BETWEEN THREE THESES OF QUINE'S "TWO DOGMAS". THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL RESEARCH (AFAGHE HEKMAT)[Internet]. 2016;4(2 (10)):7-32. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/232746/en

IEEE: Copy

ZIA MOVAHED, and HOSEIN SHAQAQI, “SURVEY OF THE RELATIONS BETWEEN THREE THESES OF QUINE'S "TWO DOGMAS",” THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL RESEARCH (AFAGHE HEKMAT), vol. 4, no. 2 (10), pp. 7–32, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/232746/en

Related Journal Papers