Expounding and criticizing three main objections against Gettier’ s paper

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Soleimani Mahdi; FATH TAHERI ALI; seif Seyed Masoud

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL RESEARCH (AFAGHE HEKMAT) Year:2018 | Volume:6 | Issue:14 Page(s): 87-115

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,148

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Expounding and criticizing three main objections against Gettier’ s paper

Author(s)

Soleimani Mahdi | FATH TAHERI ALI | seif Seyed Masoud | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

The Tripartite Definition of KnowledgeQ2

Epistemic JustificationQ2

Gettier’Q1

s CounterexamplesQ1

Abstract

The consequences of Getter’ s paper were vast and profound that some epistemologists, in order to get rid of this predicament, decided to cast serious doubts on all contents of his paper. We have selected three main samples, among the objections explaining in detail. These objections are as following: (1) bewilderment in the claim that Gettier’; s Counterexamples embrace all kind of knowledge, (2) perplexity in historical and epistemological importance of his claim, and (3) hesitating in validity of deductions are used in his Counterexamples. In rejecting (1), it will be shown that how we can generalize the idea behind his Counterexamples to all kinds of knowledge and reveal the inclusiveness of his claim. We have divided objection (2) into two sections. At first, by assessing Plato’ s and Aristotle’ s standpoints concerning the nature of knowledge, its origin and features, we have revealed that why Gettier’; s claim has a Platonic-Aristotelian origin and finally, should be regarded as a classic view. Then, we showed that why doubting on epistemological importance of Gettier’; s claim should not be neglected and how it caused turning from assessing tripartite definition of knowledge to assessing Epistemic Justification. In rejecting objection (3), we have examined two proposed ways to undermine the validity of Gettier’; s inferences and showed why both are untenable.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Soleimani, Mahdi, FATH TAHERI, ALI, & seif, Seyed Masoud. (2018). Expounding and criticizing three main objections against Gettier’ s paper. THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL RESEARCH (AFAGHE HEKMAT), 6(14 ), 87-115. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/232806/en

Vancouver: Copy

Soleimani Mahdi, FATH TAHERI ALI, seif Seyed Masoud. Expounding and criticizing three main objections against Gettier’ s paper. THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL RESEARCH (AFAGHE HEKMAT)[Internet]. 2018;6(14 ):87-115. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/232806/en

IEEE: Copy

Mahdi Soleimani, ALI FATH TAHERI, and Seyed Masoud seif, “ Expounding and criticizing three main objections against Gettier’ s paper,” THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL RESEARCH (AFAGHE HEKMAT), vol. 6, no. 14 , pp. 87–115, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/232806/en

Related Journal Papers