THE EVALUATION OF ACCURACY IN CLOSED AND OPEN ENVIRONMENTS: AN APPROACH OF COGNITIVE STYLE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BAHRAMI ALIREZA; GHOTBI VARZANE AHMAD; SAEMI ESMAEIL

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: MOTOR BEHAVIOR (RESEARCH ON SPORT SCIENCE) Year:2013 | Volume:5 | Issue:13 Page(s): 77-94

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

798

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE EVALUATION OF ACCURACY IN CLOSED AND OPEN ENVIRONMENTS: AN APPROACH OF COGNITIVE STYLE

Author(s)

BAHRAMI ALIREZA | GHOTBI VARZANE AHMAD | SAEMI ESMAEIL | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ACCURACYQ2

CLOSED ENVIRONMENTQ2

OPEN ENVIRONMENTQ2

FIELD DEPENDENTQ2

FIELD INDEPENDENTQ2

Abstract

Witkin claimed that field independence could be an advantage for participants in closed skills and environments, while field dependence could be an advantage for participants in open skills and environments. For further confirmation, the present study performed to examine the throwing ACCURACY of FIELD DEPENDENT-independent participants in closed and OPEN ENVIRONMENTs. The Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT) distributed among 320 male students, and at the result, base on their GEFT scores, 90 participants placed into three groups of FIELD DEPENDENT, neutral, and FIELD INDEPENDENT (30 participants in per groups). The study was performed in closed and OPEN ENVIRONMENTs (45 participants in each environment). The study task included dart throwing in each environment. Participants throw 10 darts in pretest stage. In acquisition stage, participants throw 60 darts in 6 blocks of 10 trials. The retention test included a block 10 trial which performed at 24 hours after acquisition stage. After checking the dates normality using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and equality of variances using Levenes test, dates analyzed with factorial variance analyze with repeated measure, two- way variance analyze test, and Bonferoni Post Hock test statistical methods. The results indicated that there were significant difference among groups in acquisition (F=5.35, P=0.006) and retention (F=4.46, P=00.01) stages. FIELD DEPENDENT participants showed better performance both closed and OPEN ENVIRONMENTs in acquisition and retention stages than FIELD DEPENDENT and neutral participants. The study only partially confirmed the Witkins FIELD DEPENDENT-independent theory.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BAHRAMI, ALIREZA, GHOTBI VARZANE, AHMAD, & SAEMI, ESMAEIL. (2013). THE EVALUATION OF ACCURACY IN CLOSED AND OPEN ENVIRONMENTS: AN APPROACH OF COGNITIVE STYLE. MOTOR BEHAVIOR (RESEARCH ON SPORT SCIENCE), 5(13), 77-94. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/232937/en

Vancouver: Copy

BAHRAMI ALIREZA, GHOTBI VARZANE AHMAD, SAEMI ESMAEIL. THE EVALUATION OF ACCURACY IN CLOSED AND OPEN ENVIRONMENTS: AN APPROACH OF COGNITIVE STYLE. MOTOR BEHAVIOR (RESEARCH ON SPORT SCIENCE)[Internet]. 2013;5(13):77-94. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/232937/en

IEEE: Copy

ALIREZA BAHRAMI, AHMAD GHOTBI VARZANE, and ESMAEIL SAEMI, “THE EVALUATION OF ACCURACY IN CLOSED AND OPEN ENVIRONMENTS: AN APPROACH OF COGNITIVE STYLE,” MOTOR BEHAVIOR (RESEARCH ON SPORT SCIENCE), vol. 5, no. 13, pp. 77–94, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/232937/en

Related Journal Papers