In Defense of Thought: A Critical Review of Three Works in the Field of Method of Research in History

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KHAZAEI YAGHOUB

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES Year:2019 | Volume:18 | Issue:10 (62) Page(s): 45-64

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

368

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

In Defense of Thought: A Critical Review of Three Works in the Field of Method of Research in History

Author(s)

KHAZAEI YAGHOUB | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

MethodQ2

MethodologyQ2

CritiqueQ1

PositivismQ2

Inductive MethodQ1

TheoryQ2

Philosophical ThinkingQ1

Abstract

Today, the discussion of Method and Methodology is one of the important measures of science in any field of science. Perhaps now, without knowledge of the Method and Methodology the claim of science in every discipline is questioned. In doing so, the present study criticizes three published works in the field of research Method in the history, namely Research Method in Historiography by Dr. Jahangir Ghaem Maghami, An Introduction to Research Method in the History by Dr. Alireza Mollaiy Tavani and Method of Research in History by Dr. Hassan Hazratiand, evaluating the Method and Methodology and its relation with thinking in the history. This Critique reveals the implications of adopting a positivist approach in the history. The adoption of the Methodological patterns of natural sciences in history, weakening the position of criticism, Undermining the position of thought in history, ignoring the role of the historian as at least part of the process of producing history, etc. are the consequences of adopting a positivist approach in history. Accordingly, it is the current research strategy that arrangements are to be considered by that, thinking in history becomes the dominant position. The present article aims to establish a distinct relation between history and thought, and there is a definition and interpretation of history and historical Methodology, advocating strengthening thinking.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KHAZAEI, YAGHOUB. (2019). In Defense of Thought: A Critical Review of Three Works in the Field of Method of Research in History. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES, 18(10 (62)), 45-64. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/235205/en

Vancouver: Copy

KHAZAEI YAGHOUB. In Defense of Thought: A Critical Review of Three Works in the Field of Method of Research in History. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES[Internet]. 2019;18(10 (62)):45-64. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/235205/en

IEEE: Copy

YAGHOUB KHAZAEI, “In Defense of Thought: A Critical Review of Three Works in the Field of Method of Research in History,” JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES, vol. 18, no. 10 (62), pp. 45–64, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/235205/en

Related Journal Papers