DEVELOPING THE FRANK AND MORGAN TECHNIQUE FOR INDUSTRIAL FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GOLMOHAMADI R.; MOHAMMADFAM I.; SHAFIE MOTLAGH M.; FARADMAL J.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Health and Safety at Work Year:2013 | Volume:3 | Issue:3 Page(s): 1-10

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,684

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

DEVELOPING THE FRANK AND MORGAN TECHNIQUE FOR INDUSTRIAL FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT

Author(s)

GOLMOHAMADI R. | MOHAMMADFAM I. | SHAFIE MOTLAGH M. | FARADMAL J. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

RISK ASSESSMENTQ2

FIREQ3

FRANK AND MORGANQ4

CHEMICAL INDUSTRYQ4

Abstract

Introduction: Every year many people around the world lose their lives or suffer from injuries and serious damages in industrial FIRE. This study aims at evaluating FIRE risk using an suitable method and determining endangered humane, financial and environmental capitals in various parts of a chemical industries.Material and Method: In this analytical study the developed FRANK AND MORGAN method was used to evaluate the risk offire in all units of a chemical company. Improved checklists validity was confirmed by experts and then, its reliability was determined by test-retest analyzing method. Human, financial and environmental probable losses were calculated in the case offire. A risk factor was determined for each unit and all of them were prioritized accordingly.Result: The study of developed checklists’ validity showed that there was a high conformity (homogeneity) between results of two measured loads (ICC=0.87, %95CI: 0.699-0.952). Mean value of risk in units was 115.45 and research and development (R & D) and sparse part store units have the highest and lowest risk values, respectively. Endangered humane, financial and environmental capitals had the highest to lowest score, respectively.Conclusion: Results showed that the developed FRANK AND MORGAN method can be a suitable tool for evaluating industrial FIRE risk and prioritizing units in general level of an industrial complex especially chemicals company. According to the findings in this study, the investigation of likely damages to environment in the case offire has high importance.

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GOLMOHAMADI, R., MOHAMMADFAM, I., SHAFIE MOTLAGH, M., & FARADMAL, J.. (2013). DEVELOPING THE FRANK AND MORGAN TECHNIQUE FOR INDUSTRIAL FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT. JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SAFETY AT WORK, 3(3), 1-10. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/235632/en

Vancouver: Copy

GOLMOHAMADI R., MOHAMMADFAM I., SHAFIE MOTLAGH M., FARADMAL J.. DEVELOPING THE FRANK AND MORGAN TECHNIQUE FOR INDUSTRIAL FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT. JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SAFETY AT WORK[Internet]. 2013;3(3):1-10. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/235632/en

IEEE: Copy

R. GOLMOHAMADI, I. MOHAMMADFAM, M. SHAFIE MOTLAGH, and J. FARADMAL, “DEVELOPING THE FRANK AND MORGAN TECHNIQUE FOR INDUSTRIAL FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT,” JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SAFETY AT WORK, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/235632/en

Related Journal Papers