مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

833
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

BIOEFFICACY COMPARISON OF HERBAL METHIONINE VERSUS SYNTHETIC METHIONINE ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE BASIS IN BROILER CHICKENS

Pages

  15-27

Abstract

 This experiment was carried out to determine the bioefficacy of HERBAL METHIONINE (H-Met)® versus to DLmethionine (DL-Met) on growth performance basisin BROILER CHICKENs. A total of 160 day-old male BROILER CHICKENs (Ross 308) were used in a completely randomized design and were randomly assigned to 8 treatments, 4 replicates and 5 chicks in every experimental unit (cage).Treatments included basal diet supplemented increasingly with HERBAL METHIONINE and DL-methionine during three growth periods of chickens.Multiexponential regression was used to determined BIOAVAILABILITY of H-Met® relative to DL-Met on growth performance basis in broilers. Body weight gain and feed intake of the broilers fed H-Met or DL Met improved in the experiment, regardless of Met sources, relative to those broilers fed basal diet. The BIOAVAILABILITY of HMet® relative to DL-Met with considering body weight gain, feed intake and feed conversion ratio in starter period were 45, 77 and 82% respectively, in grower period were 55, 69 and 75% respectively and in finisher period were 57, 71 and 75% respectively. Totally, the average BIOAVAILABILITY of H-Met® versus to DL-Met is 65% for BROILER CHICKENs.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    HADINIA, SH., MORAVEJ, H., SHIVAZAD, M., & NABI, M.M.. (2013). BIOEFFICACY COMPARISON OF HERBAL METHIONINE VERSUS SYNTHETIC METHIONINE ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE BASIS IN BROILER CHICKENS. ANIMAL PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2(1), 15-27. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/237180/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HADINIA SH., MORAVEJ H., SHIVAZAD M., NABI M.M.. BIOEFFICACY COMPARISON OF HERBAL METHIONINE VERSUS SYNTHETIC METHIONINE ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE BASIS IN BROILER CHICKENS. ANIMAL PRODUCTION RESEARCH[Internet]. 2013;2(1):15-27. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/237180/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SH. HADINIA, H. MORAVEJ, M. SHIVAZAD, and M.M. NABI, “BIOEFFICACY COMPARISON OF HERBAL METHIONINE VERSUS SYNTHETIC METHIONINE ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE BASIS IN BROILER CHICKENS,” ANIMAL PRODUCTION RESEARCH, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 15–27, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/237180/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top