UNDERSTANDING CONTEMPORARY RELIGIOUS SCHOLARS' READINGS OF JURISPRUDENCE OF POLITICS: CASE STUDY OF MORTEZA ANSARI, MIRZA NAEINI AND IMAM KHOMEINI (RA)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HEIDARI BEHNOIYEH ABBAS; ABDULLAHPOUR CHENARI MOHAMMAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: ISLAMIC POLITICS RESEARCH Year:2015 | Volume:3 | Issue:7 Page(s): 63-87

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

618

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

UNDERSTANDING CONTEMPORARY RELIGIOUS SCHOLARS' READINGS OF JURISPRUDENCE OF POLITICS: CASE STUDY OF MORTEZA ANSARI, MIRZA NAEINI AND IMAM KHOMEINI (RA)

Author(s)

HEIDARI BEHNOIYEH ABBAS | ABDULLAHPOUR CHENARI MOHAMMAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

JURISPRUDENCE OF POLITICSQ2

WILAYAT AL-FAQIHQ2

PUBLIC AFFAIRSQ1

NON-LITIGIOUS (HISBAH) AFFAIRSQ2

Abstract

Jurisprudence and politics or the JURISPRUDENCE OF POLITICS is as long as divine religions especially Islam (History), but the relationship between jurisprudence and politics, especially from the viewpoint of contemporary religious scholars, is vague (problem), of course, this issue has been discussed a lot but insufficiently (Background); as a result, we face this question now: What are the readings of contemporary religious scholars (Morteza Ansari, Ayatollah Naeini and Imam Khomeini (RA)) of the issue of JURISPRUDENCE OF POLITICS (Question). It seems that, on the one hand, they have presented a reading adapted from religion, and on the other hand, according to the situation and to the extent of their understanding, they have presented different relations between jurisprudence and politics (hypothesis). The present research is about the understanding of contemporary religious scholars of the issue of JURISPRUDENCE OF POLITICS (Objective); in order to reach this goal, interpretive method was used (Methodology). Investigations of this research showed that Morteza Ansari, by considering absolute wilayah for the Infallible Imams (A.S), introduced establishing the principle of absolute wilayah for the duly competent religious scholars; Naeini, by considering genetic (al-Takwini) and legislative (al-Tashri‘i) wilayah for religious scholars, regards legislative wilayah for them. Imam Khomeini (RA) considers absolute wilayah for Infallible Imams and Wali al-Faqih; a wilayah that manifests the responsibility of religious scholars in PUBLIC AFFAIRS and on the other hand, regards the position of judgment and politics as equal and stipulates that the duly competent religious scholar must be just (Finding).

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HEIDARI BEHNOIYEH, ABBAS, & ABDULLAHPOUR CHENARI, MOHAMMAD. (2015). UNDERSTANDING CONTEMPORARY RELIGIOUS SCHOLARS' READINGS OF JURISPRUDENCE OF POLITICS: CASE STUDY OF MORTEZA ANSARI, MIRZA NAEINI AND IMAM KHOMEINI (RA). ISLAMIC POLITICS RESEARCH, 3(7), 63-87. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/241760/en

Vancouver: Copy

HEIDARI BEHNOIYEH ABBAS, ABDULLAHPOUR CHENARI MOHAMMAD. UNDERSTANDING CONTEMPORARY RELIGIOUS SCHOLARS' READINGS OF JURISPRUDENCE OF POLITICS: CASE STUDY OF MORTEZA ANSARI, MIRZA NAEINI AND IMAM KHOMEINI (RA). ISLAMIC POLITICS RESEARCH[Internet]. 2015;3(7):63-87. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/241760/en

IEEE: Copy

ABBAS HEIDARI BEHNOIYEH, and MOHAMMAD ABDULLAHPOUR CHENARI, “UNDERSTANDING CONTEMPORARY RELIGIOUS SCHOLARS' READINGS OF JURISPRUDENCE OF POLITICS: CASE STUDY OF MORTEZA ANSARI, MIRZA NAEINI AND IMAM KHOMEINI (RA),” ISLAMIC POLITICS RESEARCH, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 63–87, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/241760/en

Related Journal Papers