مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

2,584
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE EFFICACY OF LOGBOOK IN CLINICAL WARDS FROM THE VIEWPOINTS OF NURSING FACULTY MEMBERS AND STUDENTS OF ZAHEDAN NURSING AND MIDWIFERY SCHOOL

Pages

  55-64

Abstract

 Introduction: promoting clinical training of NURSING STUDENTS is an important feature that needs to constant assessment, in this regards, log book consider as an effective clinical assessment method. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of LOGBOOK in clinical wards from the viewpoints of NURSING faculty members and STUDENTS of Zahedan NURSING and MIDWIFERY School. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 100 STUDENTS and 24 faculty members of Zahedan NURSING and MIDWIFERY School were studied in 1396. The data were gathered via a researcher-made questionnaire composed of two sections including demographic characteristics and questions related to the LOGBOOK contains four areas of quality, necessity, outcomes and how to complete the LOGBOOK with 42 items and an open-ended question. Content validity approved by faculty members and reliability was confirmed by test-retest (0.80). Data were analyzed by descriptive and analytical statistics (independent t-test) using SPSS software. Findings: 87.5% of faculties and 44% of the STUDENTS believed that using LOGBOOK was necessary in the practical courses. More than 60% of faculties and STUDENTS believed that LOGBOOK activities did not fit STUDENTS' needs. In addition, 66.7% of faculties and 59% of STUDENTS filled out the LOGBOOK daily. The average total score of the view of faculties and STUDENTS from the LOGBOOK were 52.58±9.18 and 43.22±9.80, respectively. There was a significant difference between the mean scores of the two groups (P<0.001).Conclusion: Based on findings, faculties' viewpoints regarding the LOGBOOK was more positive than the STUDENTS but since LOGBOOK has to meet student learning needs, revising the content of LOGBOOK continually is necessary.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    NAJAFI, F., KERMAN SARAVI, F., MIRMORTAZAVI, M., & GHEISARANPOUR, H.A.. (2017). THE EFFICACY OF LOGBOOK IN CLINICAL WARDS FROM THE VIEWPOINTS OF NURSING FACULTY MEMBERS AND STUDENTS OF ZAHEDAN NURSING AND MIDWIFERY SCHOOL. RESEARCH IN MEDICAL EDUCATION, 9(3 ), 55-64. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/244455/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    NAJAFI F., KERMAN SARAVI F., MIRMORTAZAVI M., GHEISARANPOUR H.A.. THE EFFICACY OF LOGBOOK IN CLINICAL WARDS FROM THE VIEWPOINTS OF NURSING FACULTY MEMBERS AND STUDENTS OF ZAHEDAN NURSING AND MIDWIFERY SCHOOL. RESEARCH IN MEDICAL EDUCATION[Internet]. 2017;9(3 ):55-64. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/244455/en

    IEEE: Copy

    F. NAJAFI, F. KERMAN SARAVI, M. MIRMORTAZAVI, and H.A. GHEISARANPOUR, “THE EFFICACY OF LOGBOOK IN CLINICAL WARDS FROM THE VIEWPOINTS OF NURSING FACULTY MEMBERS AND STUDENTS OF ZAHEDAN NURSING AND MIDWIFERY SCHOOL,” RESEARCH IN MEDICAL EDUCATION, vol. 9, no. 3 , pp. 55–64, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/244455/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top