مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,108
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES FACULTY MEMBERS’ VIEWPOINTS ABOUT THE TEACHERS’ EVALUATION SYSTEM: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Pages

  7-15

Abstract

 Background and aim: According to the different advantages and disadvantages of students questionnaires as a source of TEACHERs’ EVALUATION, this qualitative study aimed to find out the FACULTY MEMBERs’ viewpoints about the present TEACHERs’ EVALUATION process in TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES.Materials and Methods: The present study is a qualitative study based on content analysis which was conducted on 20 FACULTY MEMBERs of TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES chosen purposefully and reached the saturation level. The data were gathered and analyzed in 2013. Data were collected through a topic guide containing 3 main questions with semi structured interviews and were analyzed through applying a five-step content analysis using Atlas ti.Results: Findings showed that there were 4 themes and 17 subthemes which are as follows: clarifying the purpose of TEACHER EVALUATION (Correction or punishment), correcting the evaluative methods (development of mixed EVALUATION method, EVALUATION sheet correction, and designing of EVALUATION tools), determining the strengths and weaknesses of each method (students’ questionnaire, managers’ questionnaire, peer review, self-EVALUATION, and portfolio).Conclusion: It is necessary to clarify the aim of EVALUATION and emphasize its positive aspects applying a mixed method of students’ questionnaire, managers’ questionnaire, peer review, self EVALUATION, portfolio, observation of colleagues while teaching, measurement of students’ achievements to achieve a comprehensive evaluating of FACULTY MEMBERs.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    BASTANI, P., AMINI, M., TAHERNEZHAD, A., & ROOHOLLAHI, N.. (2014). THE TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES FACULTY MEMBERS’ VIEWPOINTS ABOUT THE TEACHERS’ EVALUATION SYSTEM: A QUALITATIVE STUDY. JOURNAL OF TORBAT HEYDARIYEH UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2(1), 7-15. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/244778/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    BASTANI P., AMINI M., TAHERNEZHAD A., ROOHOLLAHI N.. THE TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES FACULTY MEMBERS’ VIEWPOINTS ABOUT THE TEACHERS’ EVALUATION SYSTEM: A QUALITATIVE STUDY. JOURNAL OF TORBAT HEYDARIYEH UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2014;2(1):7-15. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/244778/en

    IEEE: Copy

    P. BASTANI, M. AMINI, A. TAHERNEZHAD, and N. ROOHOLLAHI, “THE TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES FACULTY MEMBERS’ VIEWPOINTS ABOUT THE TEACHERS’ EVALUATION SYSTEM: A QUALITATIVE STUDY,” JOURNAL OF TORBAT HEYDARIYEH UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 7–15, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/244778/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button