A Critique of the Claim of Mulla Sadra's Accepting the Theory of Considering Revelation as Vision

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NEJATI MOHAMMAD; Taghavi Seyyed Abbas

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Ma`rifat-e Kalami Year:2019 | Volume:9 | Issue:2 (21) Page(s): 79-92

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

443

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Critique of the Claim of Mulla Sadra's Accepting the Theory of Considering Revelation as Vision

Author(s)

NEJATI MOHAMMAD | Taghavi Seyyed Abbas | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

the interpretation of the Qur'anQ2

revelationQ2

Mulla SadraQ1

ResurrectionQ2

Abstract

In some positions in his articles and in order to explain the basis of regarding revelation as vision, Dr. Soroush, claims that Mulla Sadra’ s interpretation of the initial verses of Surah al-Vaghe’ a and his emphasis on the realization of the Resurrection in the present time, confirms Sadra's belief in this theory. The present study reviews this claim under the two rubrics of Mulla Sadra's views on revelation and his views on the truth of the Resurrection. Mulla Sadra's revelation studies confirms that not only has he not acknowledged regarding revelation as vision in any of his views and beliefs about revelation, but he has emphasized that revelation has a verbal and oratorical reality. Of course, his main concern in this matter is to explain the quality of the physical nature of the process of revelation, including the nature of the relationship between the Prophet and the Angel of revelation in the physical and sensible aspect of the revelation. But regarding Mulla Sadra's affirmation of the realization of the Resurrection in the present time, it should be noted that, in contrast to Dr Soroush's claim, Mulla Sadra has considered the time of the Major Resurrection as ambiguous. He has drawn a distinction between the Minor Resurrection and Major Resurrection and merely referred to the realization of the Minor Resurrection. In fact, what Mulla Sadra believes in is the Minor Resurrection, which Dr Soroush doesn’ t believe in, and what Dr. Soroush refers to in his sixth articles (the Major Resurrection) is not approved by Mulla Sadra.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

NEJATI, MOHAMMAD, & Taghavi, Seyyed Abbas. (2019). A Critique of the Claim of Mulla Sadra's Accepting the Theory of Considering Revelation as Vision. MARIFAT I KALAMI, 9(2 (21) ), 79-92. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/245780/en

Vancouver: Copy

NEJATI MOHAMMAD, Taghavi Seyyed Abbas. A Critique of the Claim of Mulla Sadra's Accepting the Theory of Considering Revelation as Vision. MARIFAT I KALAMI[Internet]. 2019;9(2 (21) ):79-92. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/245780/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD NEJATI, and Seyyed Abbas Taghavi, “A Critique of the Claim of Mulla Sadra's Accepting the Theory of Considering Revelation as Vision,” MARIFAT I KALAMI, vol. 9, no. 2 (21) , pp. 79–92, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/245780/en

Related Journal Papers