مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,353
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

2

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATING AND COMPARISON OF FUZZY LOGIC AND ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS IN RANKING AND QUANTITATIVE SAFETY RISK ANALYSIS (CASE STUDY: A COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANT)

Pages

  169-174

Abstract

 Background and Objectives: ACCIDENTs prevention and protecting of human capital as the main element in the development of any country is important. This study aimed to use the best available techniques for identifying hazards and assessing risks, in lodge to improve safety, bring down ACCIDENTs and costs and save time.Materials and Methods: To identify hazards, a documentation review was used, interviews with experts, brainstorming sessions, knowledge and experience group of experts in occupational health and safety engineering were employed. Finally the risks were ranked and compared based on using the degree of Belief approach in FUZZY LOGIC and ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS methods.Results: In the present survey, among of the 11 instances of identifying hazards, explosion and fire gas turbines and bust steam pipes under pressure ranked in the first spot and drop down in tanks reservoirs and canals had second place. It was also noted that the effect of the two methods used in this study, are together compatible and consistent.Conclusion: Using the FUZZY LOGIC with Multi Criteria Decision Making techniques such as AHP are providing appropriate and complementary approach to identify priorities in the safety control system. In fact, when the decision-makers agree in determining the adjusted data, using these two independent methods will follow the same results in the risk rating.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

ASKARIPOOR, T., KAZEMI, E., AGHAEI, H., & MARZBAN, M.. (2015). EVALUATING AND COMPARISON OF FUZZY LOGIC AND ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS IN RANKING AND QUANTITATIVE SAFETY RISK ANALYSIS (CASE STUDY: A COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANT). JOURNAL OF SAFETY PROMOTION AND INJURY PREVENTION, 3(3), 169-174. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/248021/en

Vancouver: Copy

ASKARIPOOR T., KAZEMI E., AGHAEI H., MARZBAN M.. EVALUATING AND COMPARISON OF FUZZY LOGIC AND ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS IN RANKING AND QUANTITATIVE SAFETY RISK ANALYSIS (CASE STUDY: A COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANT). JOURNAL OF SAFETY PROMOTION AND INJURY PREVENTION[Internet]. 2015;3(3):169-174. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/248021/en

IEEE: Copy

T. ASKARIPOOR, E. KAZEMI, H. AGHAEI, and M. MARZBAN, “EVALUATING AND COMPARISON OF FUZZY LOGIC AND ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS IN RANKING AND QUANTITATIVE SAFETY RISK ANALYSIS (CASE STUDY: A COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANT),” JOURNAL OF SAFETY PROMOTION AND INJURY PREVENTION, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 169–174, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/248021/en

Related Journal Papers

Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top