A CRITIQUE OF FOUNDATIONALISM

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SAEDIMEHR M.; GHASEMI Z.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: KNOWLEDGE (JOURNAL OF HUMAN SCIENCES) Year:2010 | Volume:- | Issue:62/1 Page(s): 157-187

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

949

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A CRITIQUE OF FOUNDATIONALISM

Author(s)

SAEDIMEHR M. | GHASEMI Z. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

FOUNDATIONALISMQ2

CLASSICAL FOUNDATIONALISMQ3

INTERNALISMQ2

BASIC BELIEFQ3

NON-INFERENTIAL JUSTIFICATIONQ3

NON-DOXASTIC JUSTIFICATIONQ3

Abstract

FOUNDATIONALISM is one of the theories proposed concerning the structure of justification and knowledge. This theory, as well as alternative ones have faced many objections. Some of these objections have questioned the foundational structure of justification, in general, and tried to rule out BASIC BELIEFs or to promote a symmetrical structure for justified beliefs. The others just criticize certain versions of this theory and deny some of the main claims of FOUNDATIONALISM such as NON-DOXASTIC JUSTIFICATION of BASIC BELIEFs, their infallibility and the inference of BASIC BELIEFs from phenomenal ones. In order to explore these objections and respond to them, this paper is in three parts: the first part deals with objections of beliefs that are claimed to be justified as non-inferential. In the second part we try to explicate objections raised in connection with the NON-DOXASTIC JUSTIFICATION of BASIC BELIEFs and the third part specifically deals with the criticisms of classical FOUNDATIONALISM. We conclude that despite many objections, this theory still is the most reasonable theory concerning the structure of justification and knowledge.

Cites

No record.

References

دوگونه مبناگرایی

Cite

APA: Copy

SAEDIMEHR, M., & GHASEMI, Z.. (2010). A CRITIQUE OF FOUNDATIONALISM. KNOWLEDGE (JOURNAL OF HUMAN SCIENCES), -(62/1), 157-187. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/248292/en

Vancouver: Copy

SAEDIMEHR M., GHASEMI Z.. A CRITIQUE OF FOUNDATIONALISM. KNOWLEDGE (JOURNAL OF HUMAN SCIENCES)[Internet]. 2010;-(62/1):157-187. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/248292/en

IEEE: Copy

M. SAEDIMEHR, and Z. GHASEMI, “A CRITIQUE OF FOUNDATIONALISM,” KNOWLEDGE (JOURNAL OF HUMAN SCIENCES), vol. -, no. 62/1, pp. 157–187, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/248292/en

Related Journal Papers