COMPARISON OF SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOILS COMPACTED BY STATIC AND DYNAMIC METHODS UNDER UNDRAINED CONDITION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GHOBADIAN R.; RAHIMI HASAN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: THE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE (SJA) Year:2006 | Volume:29 | Issue:2 Page(s): 23-32

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,964

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOILS COMPACTED BY STATIC AND DYNAMIC METHODS UNDER UNDRAINED CONDITION

Author(s)

GHOBADIAN R. | RAHIMI HASAN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

STATIC COMPACTIONQ3

DYNAMIC COMPACTIONQ3

SHEAR STRENGTHQ3

Abstract

In order to evaluate the SHEAR STRENGTH parameters of compacted soils precisely it is necessary to determine these parameters in the laboratory by the compaction tests using remolded samples. The laboratory compaction test conditions should be comparable to the field compaction conditions. It is a common practice to conduct the compaction test in the laboratory using the DYNAMIC COMPACTION method (Proctor method) in which compaction is being performed by a hammer whereas sheep foot and smooth steel rollers are utilized in the field. In this study, evaluation of the effect of various compaction methods on SHEAR STRENGTH parameters c and j and unconfined compression strength qu of soils has been done. The fine-grained soils selected in this study have been CL-ML, CL and CH classified according to Unified Soil Classification System. Static and DYNAMIC COMPACTION tests have been conducted on many remolded soil sample. The unconfined and triaxial compression tests have been done on these samples. The results of the unconfined and triaxial tests obtained from the samples compacted by the static method have shown greater strength compared to those obtained from the dynamic method.However, statistical studies indicate that the method of compaction has no significant effect on the SHEAR STRENGTH of soils.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GHOBADIAN, R., & RAHIMI, HASAN. (2006). COMPARISON OF SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOILS COMPACTED BY STATIC AND DYNAMIC METHODS UNDER UNDRAINED CONDITION. THE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE (SJA), 29(2), 23-32. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/24831/en

Vancouver: Copy

GHOBADIAN R., RAHIMI HASAN. COMPARISON OF SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOILS COMPACTED BY STATIC AND DYNAMIC METHODS UNDER UNDRAINED CONDITION. THE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE (SJA)[Internet]. 2006;29(2):23-32. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/24831/en

IEEE: Copy

R. GHOBADIAN, and HASAN RAHIMI, “COMPARISON OF SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOILS COMPACTED BY STATIC AND DYNAMIC METHODS UNDER UNDRAINED CONDITION,” THE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE (SJA), vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 23–32, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/24831/en

Related Journal Papers