GINGIVAL MICROLEAKAGE IN CLASS II COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS USING DIFFERENT FLOWABLE COMPOSITES AS LINER: AN IN VITRO EVALUATION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

LOTFI NEDA; ESMAEILI BEHNAZ; AHMADIZENOUZ GHAZALEH; BIJANI ALI; KHADEM HADI

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Caspian Journal of Dental Research Year:2015 | Volume:4 | Issue:1 Page(s): 10-16

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

642

Download:

245

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

GINGIVAL MICROLEAKAGE IN CLASS II COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS USING DIFFERENT FLOWABLE COMPOSITES AS LINER: AN IN VITRO EVALUATION

Author(s)

Keywords

COMPOSITE RESINSQ3

DENTAL LEAKAGEQ4

DENTAL CAVITY LININGQ4

POLYMERIZATIONQ4

Abstract

Introduction: One of the main disadvantages of composites is marginal microleakage; using flowable composites as a liner beneath composite restorations has been recommended to reduce microleakage. The aim of this study was to assess the microleakage of class II restorations with different flowable composites liners.Materials & Methods: 45 extracted premolars teeth with class II cavity preparation (90 cavities) were divided into five groups and filled as follows: 1.control group: hybrid composite (Z250) 2. Z250+surefil SDR flow 3.Z250+filtek supreme xt flow composite 4.Z250+Grandio flow 5.Z250+Tetric flow. Mesial and distal cavities were filled using snowplow and layering technique, respectively. After that, the samples were immersed in 0.5% fuchsin solution and sectioned. Gingival microleakage was then graded. Data were analyzed using Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U test.Results: There was no significant difference between the snowplow and layering methods. Microleakage of Tetric flow and Grandio flow liners was significantly higher than the control group. Other flowable composites showed no significant difference in comparison with the control group.Conclusion: In the present study, the results indicated that the flowable composites were not effective on reducing gingival microleakage.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

LOTFI, NEDA, ESMAEILI, BEHNAZ, AHMADIZENOUZ, GHAZALEH, BIJANI, ALI, & KHADEM, HADI. (2015). GINGIVAL MICROLEAKAGE IN CLASS II COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS USING DIFFERENT FLOWABLE COMPOSITES AS LINER: AN IN VITRO EVALUATION. CASPIAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 4(1), 10-16. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/250238/en

Vancouver: Copy

LOTFI NEDA, ESMAEILI BEHNAZ, AHMADIZENOUZ GHAZALEH, BIJANI ALI, KHADEM HADI. GINGIVAL MICROLEAKAGE IN CLASS II COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS USING DIFFERENT FLOWABLE COMPOSITES AS LINER: AN IN VITRO EVALUATION. CASPIAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH[Internet]. 2015;4(1):10-16. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/250238/en

IEEE: Copy

NEDA LOTFI, BEHNAZ ESMAEILI, GHAZALEH AHMADIZENOUZ, ALI BIJANI, and HADI KHADEM, “GINGIVAL MICROLEAKAGE IN CLASS II COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS USING DIFFERENT FLOWABLE COMPOSITES AS LINER: AN IN VITRO EVALUATION,” CASPIAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 10–16, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/250238/en

Related Journal Papers