Legal Structure of Arbitration Regimes: Monist or Dualist System?

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Moghaddam Abrishami Ali; Mahboob Masood

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: PRIVATE LAW Year:2016 | Volume:5 | Issue:16 Page(s): 9-29

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,082

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Legal Structure of Arbitration Regimes: Monist or Dualist System?

Author(s)

Moghaddam Abrishami Ali | Mahboob Masood | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Keywords:ArbitrationQ1

Iranian lawQ1

Model LawQ1

Iranian International Commercial ArbitrationQ1

Monist systemQ1

Dualist regimeQ1

Abstract

Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration has been a source of inspiration for numerous countries. In choosing a legal structure, there is a strong tendency towards adopting a monist legal regime based on the Model Law. In Iran, as a result of the ratification of Iranian International Commercial Arbitration Act (ICAA) in 1997, Iranian arbitration law has changed its structure from monism to dualism, that is, the Civil Procedure Code is applicable to domestic arbitration, whereas ICAA applies to international arbitration. The duality of the system is not an appropriate legal structure. This article argues that Iranian arbitration law should be based on monism. It concludes that not only should Iranian arbitration law be in consistent with the Model Law 2006, but it should also extend beyond the Model Law by providing a more comprehensive legislation.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Moghaddam Abrishami, Ali, & Mahboob, Masood. (2016). Legal Structure of Arbitration Regimes: Monist or Dualist System?. PRIVATE LAW, 5(16 ), 9-29. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/252767/en

Vancouver: Copy

Moghaddam Abrishami Ali, Mahboob Masood. Legal Structure of Arbitration Regimes: Monist or Dualist System?. PRIVATE LAW[Internet]. 2016;5(16 ):9-29. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/252767/en

IEEE: Copy

Ali Moghaddam Abrishami, and Masood Mahboob, “Legal Structure of Arbitration Regimes: Monist or Dualist System?,” PRIVATE LAW, vol. 5, no. 16 , pp. 9–29, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/252767/en

Related Journal Papers