IN VITRO COMPARISON OF CORONAL MICROLEAKAGE OF FOUR TEMPORARY RESTORATIVE MATERIALS USED IN ENDODONTIC TREATMENT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHAHI SH.; MOULAEI ASL A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

823

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

IN VITRO COMPARISON OF CORONAL MICROLEAKAGE OF FOUR TEMPORARY RESTORATIVE MATERIALS USED IN ENDODONTIC TREATMENT

Author(s)

SHAHI SH. | MOULAEI ASL A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

MICROLEAKAGEQ3

DYE PENETRATIONQ3

TEMPORARY RESTORATIVE MATERIALSQ3

Abstract

Background and Aim: The use of proper TEMPORARY RESTORATIVE MATERIALS between appointments is critical in successful root canal treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare the coronal MICROLEAKAGE of four TEMPORARY RESTORATIVE MATERIALS including Zonalin, Zamherir, Coltosol and IRM.Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, standard access cavities were prepared in 120 intact extracted maxillary and mandibular human first molars. Canal preparation was carried out by the step-back technique, and obturation was performed with gutta-percha and AH26 sealer using the lateral condensation technique. Teeth were randomly divided into 4 experimental groups of 25 teeth each and two positive and negative control groups, each containing 10 teeth. In each experimental group the access cavity was restored with one of the tested materials (Zamherir, Zonalin, IRM and Coltosol). In the negative control group the access cavity was filled entirely with sticky wax and in the positive control group no restorative material was applied. DYE PENETRATION technique was used to evaluate MICROLEAKAGE which was measured under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed with one way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests. P<0.05 was considered as the limit of significance.Results: DYE PENETRATION was observed in all groups. Zonalin and Coltosol had the highest and the lowest DYE PENETRATION respectively, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in DYE PENETRATION between IRM, and either Coltosol or Zamherir (p>0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study showed that using Coltosol as a temporary restorative material can provide a better coronal seal in endodontic treatments.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SHAHI, SH., & MOULAEI ASL, A.. (2008). IN VITRO COMPARISON OF CORONAL MICROLEAKAGE OF FOUR TEMPORARY RESTORATIVE MATERIALS USED IN ENDODONTIC TREATMENT. JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE, 21(1 (54)), 24-28. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/25296/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHAHI SH., MOULAEI ASL A.. IN VITRO COMPARISON OF CORONAL MICROLEAKAGE OF FOUR TEMPORARY RESTORATIVE MATERIALS USED IN ENDODONTIC TREATMENT. JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE[Internet]. 2008;21(1 (54)):24-28. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/25296/en

IEEE: Copy

SH. SHAHI, and A. MOULAEI ASL, “IN VITRO COMPARISON OF CORONAL MICROLEAKAGE OF FOUR TEMPORARY RESTORATIVE MATERIALS USED IN ENDODONTIC TREATMENT,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE, vol. 21, no. 1 (54), pp. 24–28, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/25296/en

Related Journal Papers