SAFETY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION USING PROACTIVE INDICATORS IN A SELECTED INDUSTRY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BARKHORDARI ABOLFAZL; DEHGHANI ALI; KIANFAR ALI; MAHMOUDI SHAHRAM; AMINIFARD FATEMEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE ENGINEERING Year:2015 | Volume:1 | Issue:4 Page(s): 49-59

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

3,165

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

SAFETY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION USING PROACTIVE INDICATORS IN A SELECTED INDUSTRY

Author(s)

Keywords

SAFETYQ1

PROACTIVE INDICATORSQ2

PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONQ2

Abstract

Background & Objectives: Quality and effectiveness of SAFETY systems are critical factors in achieving their goals. This study was aimed to represent a method for PERFORMANCE EVALUATION of SAFETY systems by PROACTIVE INDICATORS using different updated models in the field of SAFETY which will be tested in a selected industry.Methods: This study is a cross-sectional study. PROACTIVE INDICATORS used in this study were: Unsafe acts rate, SAFETY Climate, Accident Proneness, and Near-miss incident rate. The number of in 1473 SAFETY climate questionnaires and 543 Accident Proneness questionnaires was completed.Results: The minimum and maximum SAFETY climate score were 56.88 and 58.2, respectively, and the minimum and maximum scores of Accident Proneness were 98.2 and 140.7, respectively. The maximum number of Nearmiss incident rate were 408 and the minimum of that was 196. The maximum number of unsafe acts rate was 43.8 percent and the minimum of that was 27.2 percent. In nine dimensions of SAFETY climate the eighth dimension (personal perception of risk) with the score of 4.07 has the lowest score and the fourth (laws and SAFETY regulations) dimension with 8.05 has the highest score. According to expert opinions, the most important indicator in the assessment of SAFETY performance was unsafe acts rate, while near-miss incident rate was the least important one.Conclusion: The results of this survey reveal that using proactive (Prospective) indicators could be an appropriate method in organizations SAFETY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION.

Cites

Assessment of Safety and Health Performance Based on ELMERI Index in One of the Steel Industries in Khuzestan Province, Iran

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BARKHORDARI, ABOLFAZL, DEHGHANI, ALI, KIANFAR, ALI, MAHMOUDI, SHAHRAM, & AMINIFARD, FATEMEH. (2015). SAFETY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION USING PROACTIVE INDICATORS IN A SELECTED INDUSTRY. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE ENGINEERING, 1(4), 49-59. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/253450/en

Vancouver: Copy

BARKHORDARI ABOLFAZL, DEHGHANI ALI, KIANFAR ALI, MAHMOUDI SHAHRAM, AMINIFARD FATEMEH. SAFETY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION USING PROACTIVE INDICATORS IN A SELECTED INDUSTRY. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE ENGINEERING[Internet]. 2015;1(4):49-59. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/253450/en

IEEE: Copy

ABOLFAZL BARKHORDARI, ALI DEHGHANI, ALI KIANFAR, SHAHRAM MAHMOUDI, and FATEMEH AMINIFARD, “SAFETY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION USING PROACTIVE INDICATORS IN A SELECTED INDUSTRY,” JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE ENGINEERING, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 49–59, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/253450/en

Related Journal Papers