COMPARISON OF CRESTAL BONE LOSS AROUND SUBMERGED AND NON- SUBMERGED REPLACE IMPLANTS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

PANJ NOUSH M.; SIADAT H.; ALI KHASI M.; ALI HOSSEINI M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Dental Medicine Year:2009 | Volume:22 | Issue:2 (59) Page(s): 116-124

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,002

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF CRESTAL BONE LOSS AROUND SUBMERGED AND NON- SUBMERGED REPLACE IMPLANTS

Author(s)

PANJ NOUSH M. | SIADAT H. | ALI KHASI M. | ALI HOSSEINI M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DENTAL IMPLANTSQ2

MARGINAL BONE LOSSQ3

SUBMERGE AND NON-SUBMERGEQ3

DIGITAL SUBTRACTIONQ3

RVGQ3

Abstract

Background and Aim: It is well recognized that implant treatment is common worldwide, but the approach to success is not predictable because of bone loss that occurs around the implants. Also there are many factors affecting crestal bone loss around the implants that one of them is the surgical protocol of implant installation. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the amount of crestal bone loss around the Replace implants installed according to submerged and non- submerged treatment protocol.Materials and Methods: In this study, 11 patients received 34 implants. In each patient (unilateral or bilateral mandible), one of the implants was placed with submerged procedure and in the other one non- submerged procedure was used. In a period of 3 months a temporary partial denture that covered the implants was used. After 3 months the submerged fixture was exposed, impression was performed and fixed prosthesis was fabricated. Loss of crestal bone at each implant was measured. These measurements have been done at surgical times, over a period of 3 months after implant installation and 6 months after the delivery of the fixed prosthesis. The measurement was done with DIGITAL SUBTRACTION radiography. Data was analyzed by Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test. Results: Three months after implant placement, submerged groups showed statistically more crestal bone loss (0.65±0.71) than non-submerged (0.41±0.53) group (p=0.02). After 6 months the mean value of crestal bone loss in submerged group was 0.21±0.40 mm and in non submerged group was 0.29±0.49 mm. This data indicated no statistically significant difference between the two groups of implants (p>0.05).Conclusion: Our results are in accordance with previously published studies and confirm that the value of crestal bone loss in submerged and non-submerged groups after 3 and 6 months were similar and in acceptable limit.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

PANJ NOUSH, M., SIADAT, H., ALI KHASI, M., & ALI HOSSEINI, M.. (2009). COMPARISON OF CRESTAL BONE LOSS AROUND SUBMERGED AND NON- SUBMERGED REPLACE IMPLANTS. JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE, 22(2 (59)), 116-124. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/25401/en

Vancouver: Copy

PANJ NOUSH M., SIADAT H., ALI KHASI M., ALI HOSSEINI M.. COMPARISON OF CRESTAL BONE LOSS AROUND SUBMERGED AND NON- SUBMERGED REPLACE IMPLANTS. JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE[Internet]. 2009;22(2 (59)):116-124. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/25401/en

IEEE: Copy

M. PANJ NOUSH, H. SIADAT, M. ALI KHASI, and M. ALI HOSSEINI, “COMPARISON OF CRESTAL BONE LOSS AROUND SUBMERGED AND NON- SUBMERGED REPLACE IMPLANTS,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE, vol. 22, no. 2 (59), pp. 116–124, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/25401/en

Related Journal Papers