INVESTIGATING COMPARABILITY OF ABILITY PARAMETER ESTIMATION IN COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE AND PAPER-PENCIL TESTS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHARIFI YEGANEH NEGAR; FALSAFINEJAD MOHAMMAD REZA; DELAVAR ALI; FAROKHI NORALI; JAMALI EHSAN

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION STUDIES Year:2016 | Volume:6 | Issue:14 Page(s): 203-234

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,097

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

INVESTIGATING COMPARABILITY OF ABILITY PARAMETER ESTIMATION IN COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE AND PAPER-PENCIL TESTS

Author(s)

Keywords

COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTINGQ1

POST HOC SIMULATIONQ1

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATIONQ1

EXPECTED A POSTERIORI ESTIMATIONQ1

TEST TERMINATION CRITERIONQ1

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the comparability of ability parameter estimation in computerized adaptive with paper-pencil testing and finding the algorithm for optimal COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING based on different kinds of ability estimation (maximum likelihood and expected a posteriori) and TEST TERMINATION CRITERION (fixed standard error and fixed length of test) in high stakes tests. The target population consisted of mathematics and engineering subgroup examinees of the Iranian university entrance exam in 2013. One thousand examinees were selected using random sampling method and mathematics questions were analyzed using 3-parameter logistic model. Equal to real numbers, 40 data sets were simulated and POST HOC SIMULATION of COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING was applied. The results indicated a strong correlation between ability estimation using computerized adaptive and paper-pencil testing of mathematics subscale.Furthermore, bias values, average absolute difference between ability estimation in computerized adaptive and paper-pencil testing and the mean squared root of the difference showed that the ability estimation in COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING using expected a posteriori is consistent with the ability estimation using the whole exam. The results suggested that COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING is capable of recovering the ability in mathematics subscale. It was concluded that expected a posteriori and test stopping rule of fixed 0.3 standard error was the optimal algorithm for suitable reliability, appropriate test length and the recovery of the ability estimation in COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING of mathematics subscale.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SHARIFI YEGANEH, NEGAR, FALSAFINEJAD, MOHAMMAD REZA, DELAVAR, ALI, FAROKHI, NORALI, & JAMALI, EHSAN. (2016). INVESTIGATING COMPARABILITY OF ABILITY PARAMETER ESTIMATION IN COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE AND PAPER-PENCIL TESTS. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION STUDIES, 6(14), 203-234. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/255235/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHARIFI YEGANEH NEGAR, FALSAFINEJAD MOHAMMAD REZA, DELAVAR ALI, FAROKHI NORALI, JAMALI EHSAN. INVESTIGATING COMPARABILITY OF ABILITY PARAMETER ESTIMATION IN COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE AND PAPER-PENCIL TESTS. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION STUDIES[Internet]. 2016;6(14):203-234. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/255235/en

IEEE: Copy

NEGAR SHARIFI YEGANEH, MOHAMMAD REZA FALSAFINEJAD, ALI DELAVAR, NORALI FAROKHI, and EHSAN JAMALI, “INVESTIGATING COMPARABILITY OF ABILITY PARAMETER ESTIMATION IN COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE AND PAPER-PENCIL TESTS,” JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION STUDIES, vol. 6, no. 14, pp. 203–234, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/255235/en

Related Journal Papers