CLINICAL EVALUATION OF APPLYING A HYDROPHOBIC AND A HYDROPHILIC BONDING AGENT ON THE RETENTION AND DURABILITY OF FISSURE SEALANT THERAPY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GHANDI MOSTAFA; NAMVAR BABAK; DAVAIE SOTODEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Dental Medicine Year:2016 | Volume:28 | Issue:4 Page(s): 298-306

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

818

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF APPLYING A HYDROPHOBIC AND A HYDROPHILIC BONDING AGENT ON THE RETENTION AND DURABILITY OF FISSURE SEALANT THERAPY

Author(s)

GHANDI MOSTAFA | NAMVAR BABAK | DAVAIE SOTODEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

FISSURE SEALANT

BONDING AGENT

RETENTION

Abstract

Background and Aims: As in FISSURE SEALANT therapy the tooth surface is mostly enamel, the use of an enamel BONDING AGENT (hydrophobic BONDING AGENT) may be more cost effective than that of newer generations of bonding (hydrophilic BONDING AGENTs). The aim of this study was to compare the RETENTION and durability of FISSURE SEALANT therapy when applying an enamel BONDING AGENT, a dentin BONDING AGENT and no BONDING AGENT during 4 years.Materials and Methods: This study was done on the first permanent molars of the upper and lower jaws of 24 students of the first grade of a primary school (6-7 years old). On 36 teeth, a dentin BONDING AGENT (Excite) was applied under the FISSURE SEALANT and on 36 teeth an enamel BONDING AGENT (Margin bond) was applied under the FISSURE SEALANT. Then, 24 teeth were selected from these two groups and were compared with a group (including 24 teeth) with no BONDING AGENT under the FISSURE SEALANT (as control group). All the fissures of the teeth were evaluated annually for 4 years to find out the presence or absence of FISSURE SEALANT substance. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon test.Results: From the statistical analysis, there was no significant difference in RETENTION and durability of the FISSURE SEALANT substance comparing the group with dentin BONDING AGENT (Excite) and the group with enamel BONDING AGENT (Margin bond). Also, using a BONDING AGENT made no significant difference (P>0.05).Conclusion: According to the results of this study, using a BONDING AGENT made no improvement in the RETENTION and durability of FISSURE SEALANT substance.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GHANDI, MOSTAFA, NAMVAR, BABAK, & DAVAIE, SOTODEH. (2016). CLINICAL EVALUATION OF APPLYING A HYDROPHOBIC AND A HYDROPHILIC BONDING AGENT ON THE RETENTION AND DURABILITY OF FISSURE SEALANT THERAPY. JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE, 28(4), 298-306. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/25577/en

Vancouver: Copy

GHANDI MOSTAFA, NAMVAR BABAK, DAVAIE SOTODEH. CLINICAL EVALUATION OF APPLYING A HYDROPHOBIC AND A HYDROPHILIC BONDING AGENT ON THE RETENTION AND DURABILITY OF FISSURE SEALANT THERAPY. JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE[Internet]. 2016;28(4):298-306. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/25577/en

IEEE: Copy

MOSTAFA GHANDI, BABAK NAMVAR, and SOTODEH DAVAIE, “CLINICAL EVALUATION OF APPLYING A HYDROPHOBIC AND A HYDROPHILIC BONDING AGENT ON THE RETENTION AND DURABILITY OF FISSURE SEALANT THERAPY,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 298–306, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/25577/en

Related Journal Papers