A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO LATERAL CEPHALOMETRY TECHNIQUES (STANDARD AND NATURAL HEAD 
POSITION)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HEDAYATI Z.; SANG S.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,508

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO LATERAL CEPHALOMETRY TECHNIQUES (STANDARD AND NATURAL HEAD POSITION)

Author(s)

HEDAYATI Z. | SANG S. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

LATERAL CEPHALOMETRYQ3

STANDARD CEPHALOMETRYQ4

NATURAL CEPHALOMETRYQ4

Abstract

Statement of problem: Cephalometric findings are of high importance in making decision about orthodontic treatment plans and orthognathic surgeries. Natural head position (NHP) is considered as a useful and exact radiographic technique.Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare two techniques, namely Standard and NHP, in LATERAL CEPHALOMETRY.Materials and Methods: In this cross- sectional study, performed in Shiraz. 138 randomly selected students (70 males and 68 females), age ranging (from (13-15), were evaluated clinically and radiographically. None of them had a history of orthodontic treatment, head and face fracture or surgical operations. Lateral cephalograms were taken in both standard and natural head position techniques, for each student. For statistical analysis, t-test for paired samples, was done. Results: This study showed that in anterior-posterior dimension, among angles with significant differences in two techniques, those of standard one were more reliable. Whereas in vertical dimension, statistical differences showed natural technique as more useful one.Conclusion: Due to the fact that NATURAL CEPHALOMETRY requires more patient cooperation, more time and a higher complex technique. It is not suggested, except when different clinical and cephotometric findings are observed.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HEDAYATI, Z., & SANG, S.. (2003). A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO LATERAL CEPHALOMETRY TECHNIQUES (STANDARD AND NATURAL HEAD POSITION). JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE, 16(1 (34)), 35-45. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/25644/en

Vancouver: Copy

HEDAYATI Z., SANG S.. A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO LATERAL CEPHALOMETRY TECHNIQUES (STANDARD AND NATURAL HEAD POSITION). JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE[Internet]. 2003;16(1 (34)):35-45. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/25644/en

IEEE: Copy

Z. HEDAYATI, and S. SANG, “A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO LATERAL CEPHALOMETRY TECHNIQUES (STANDARD AND NATURAL HEAD POSITION),” JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE, vol. 16, no. 1 (34), pp. 35–45, 2003, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/25644/en

Related Journal Papers