مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,630
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF ADSORBED SKIN DOSE RECEIVED BY PATIENTS IN CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL AND CONVENTIONAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNING

Pages

  181-187

Abstract

 Background and Aims: The evaluation of ABSORBED DOSE received by patients could give useful information for radiation risk estimation. This study was performed to compare the entrance skin dose received by patients in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), conventional and spiral computed tomography (CT).Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, 81 calibrated TLD chips were used. the TLD chips were placed on facial, thyroid and end of sternum skin surface in patients referred for CT of the paranasal sinuses (3 TLD chips for each area) to estimate the ABSORBED DOSE received by central part of radiation field, thyroid and out of field areas, respectively. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests.Results: The dose delivered to the center of irradiated field was about 0.79±0.09 mGy in CBCT technique compared with 16.31±3.71 and 18.84±4.12 mGy for spiral and conventional CT, respectively. The received dose by the out of field areas was about 54 percent of central area dose. There was statistical significant relationship between the imaging modalities and ABSORBED DOSE received by patients (P=0.016). The least ABSORBED DOSE was for CBCT and the greatest dose was for conventional CT imaging technique.Conclusion: The dose delivered to central area of irradiated field in conventional and SPIRAL CT imaging modalities was about 24 times greater than of that in CBCT. Also, the highest received dose was for central area of radiated field and the lowest dose was for the out of field areas.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    GHAZI KHANLOU SANI, K., ESKANDARLOU, A., ROSTAMPOUR, N., & RAHIMI, A.. (2011). COMPARISON OF ADSORBED SKIN DOSE RECEIVED BY PATIENTS IN CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL AND CONVENTIONAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNING. JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE, 24(3 (68)), 181-187. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/25727/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    GHAZI KHANLOU SANI K., ESKANDARLOU A., ROSTAMPOUR N., RAHIMI A.. COMPARISON OF ADSORBED SKIN DOSE RECEIVED BY PATIENTS IN CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL AND CONVENTIONAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNING. JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE[Internet]. 2011;24(3 (68)):181-187. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/25727/en

    IEEE: Copy

    K. GHAZI KHANLOU SANI, A. ESKANDARLOU, N. ROSTAMPOUR, and A. RAHIMI, “COMPARISON OF ADSORBED SKIN DOSE RECEIVED BY PATIENTS IN CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL AND CONVENTIONAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNING,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE, vol. 24, no. 3 (68), pp. 181–187, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/25727/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button