LOGICAL PARADOXES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

RASOULI SHARABIANI R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES (TABRIZ) Year:2006 | Volume:49 | Issue:199 Page(s): 21-43

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

4,583

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

LOGICAL PARADOXES

Author(s)

RASOULI SHARABIANI R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PARADOXQ3

CORRESPONDENCE THEORYQ3

TRUTHQ3

Abstract

Logical PARADOXes are self vicious reference sentences that are there lies contradiction in assumption of both its TRUTHfulness and its falsing, hence. For the reason that logical PARADOXes challenge the varacity of the most important theories of logic and philosophy such as statement's ability to TRUTHfulness and falsity the CORRESPONDENCE THEORY of TRUTH, law of the excluded middle and the system of Aristotelian bivalence, finding a reliable solution for them has always been one of the most important apprehensions of moslem logicians specially in 7 th century and also some western Logicians.So that approximately ten solutions for PARADOXes have been presented by them all of which have been introduced, analyzed and criticized in this article generally. Among the presented solutions, Khaje Nassir and following him, Taftazani and Sadroddin Oashtaki, believing in hierarchy of the statement and discrimination of the statement and predicate or priority and posteriority of the TRUTH, managed to achieve an appropriate solution of PARADOXes. In recent centuries Alfred Tarsky, a western Logician, introduction the hierarchy theory of language has managed to devise a salution for these PARADOXes.But, regarding the possibility of formulating new reinforced assertions of PARADOXes, it seems that none of the stated solutions in this article is acceptable.Therefore, the author suggests that adopting the multivalence system of logic and accepting neither-true, nor - false statements which has been contemplated by some prior theologians and is more adaptable with skeptical ontology of Molla Sadra can be acceptable solution.

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

RASOULI SHARABIANI, R.. (2006). LOGICAL PARADOXES. JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES (TABRIZ), 49(199), 21-43. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/25877/en

Vancouver: Copy

RASOULI SHARABIANI R.. LOGICAL PARADOXES. JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES (TABRIZ)[Internet]. 2006;49(199):21-43. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/25877/en

IEEE: Copy

R. RASOULI SHARABIANI, “LOGICAL PARADOXES,” JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES (TABRIZ), vol. 49, no. 199, pp. 21–43, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/25877/en

Related Journal Papers