Performance Comparison of Commercial Software Tools to Determine Size Distribution of Fragmented Rocks

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Masumi Nasab S.M.; JALALI S.E.; NOROOZI M.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF MINERAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING Year:2019 | Volume:4 | Issue:3 Page(s): 51-65

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

431

Download:

332

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Performance Comparison of Commercial Software Tools to Determine Size Distribution of Fragmented Rocks

Author(s)

Masumi Nasab S.M. | JALALI S.E. | NOROOZI M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Size distribution

Screen analysis

Digital image processing

Split Desktop

WipFrag

Abstract

Rock fragmentation can show the quality of blasting. Screen analysis can be also a precise method to determine Size distribution of blasted rocks, but it is a difficult undertaking and sometimes impossible that is due to the time consumed and large volume of crushed rocks. Nowadays, Digital image processing is used to evaluate the rocks fragmentation due to its acceptable accuracy and speed. In this research, WipFrag and Split Desktop were compared for evaluation of crushed rocks. Case study was focused on fragmented rock in Jajarm limestone mine. At the first, an image was delimited manually in the both software. Then the results were compared with Screen analysis, showing that the results of Split Desktop are closer to the Screen analysis results. Maximum difference between Screen analysis and results of Split Desktop and WipFrag is equal to 3. 59% and 11. 38%, respectively. Some comparative modes including the delimitation method effect (automatically and manually), the image rotation effect, and the separation of an image into four quarter images and a combination of the results are investigated. Maximum difference between the automatically and manually delimitation by Split Desktop and WipFrag is equal to 1. 28% and 3. 79%. Maximum difference for the image rotation effect for Split Desktop and WipFrag is equal to 1. 96 perc%ent and 8. 09% and Maximum difference for the separation of an image effect for Split Desktop and WipFrag is equal to 3. 01 percent and 9. 58 percent. Consequently, in all modes investigated the Split Desktop shows more efficient results.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Masumi Nasab, S.M., JALALI, S.E., & NOROOZI, M.. (2019). Performance Comparison of Commercial Software Tools to Determine Size Distribution of Fragmented Rocks. JOURNAL OF MINERAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING, 4(3 ), 51-65. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/265435/en

Vancouver: Copy

Masumi Nasab S.M., JALALI S.E., NOROOZI M.. Performance Comparison of Commercial Software Tools to Determine Size Distribution of Fragmented Rocks. JOURNAL OF MINERAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING[Internet]. 2019;4(3 ):51-65. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/265435/en

IEEE: Copy

S.M. Masumi Nasab, S.E. JALALI, and M. NOROOZI, “Performance Comparison of Commercial Software Tools to Determine Size Distribution of Fragmented Rocks,” JOURNAL OF MINERAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING, vol. 4, no. 3 , pp. 51–65, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/265435/en

Related Journal Papers