A Review of the Nature and Application of Analogy (Qias) in Comparative Jurisprudence and Iranian Law

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Haghbejaneb Mahmood; TAVAKOLI AHMAD REZA; HEIDARI MOHAMMAD ALI

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: FIGHE MOQARAN Year:2019 | Volume:7 | Issue:13 Page(s): 297-316

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

544

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Review of the Nature and Application of Analogy (Qias) in Comparative Jurisprudence and Iranian Law

Author(s)

Haghbejaneb Mahmood | TAVAKOLI AHMAD REZA | HEIDARI MOHAMMAD ALI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Analogy

Islamic law

Imamiyyah

Sunnis

Abstract

This research is designed to provide a new look at the Analogy (Qias) and its application in Islamic law. An overview of empirical foundations suggests that most previous studies have emphasized the widespread disagreement between Shia and Sunni jurisprudents. It is often believed that there is no Analogy between Shia and Sunni in the theoretical application of Analogy. However, contrary to common beliefs, there is a broad resemblance to the use of Analogy between jurisprudents of Imamiyyah and Sunni scholars. The jurisprudents of Imamiyyah, like the Sunni jurisprudents, use the Analogy in many cases; but they use it with other titles, such as Tanqih-e Manat, etc. Thus, Shiites do not oppose the use of Analogy in jurisprudential affairs; they do not accept the use of Analogy in all affairs; whereas the Sunni jurisprudents do not have any reason to question Analogy whenever there is no reason for a ruling in the Quran or narratives. They are convinced to use Analogy because of the perception of the causes of Sharia Laws in issues related to everyday life of human, and also because of the inability to access to the true causes of all religious laws. In contrast, Shiites are skeptical about the use of Analogy in all affairs, but practically, they use Analogy in many cases and only in limited cases, they try to infer the laws with other means.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Haghbejaneb, Mahmood, TAVAKOLI, AHMAD REZA, & HEIDARI, MOHAMMAD ALI. (2019). A Review of the Nature and Application of Analogy (Qias) in Comparative Jurisprudence and Iranian Law. FIGHE MOQARAN, 7(13 ), 297-316. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/267002/en

Vancouver: Copy

Haghbejaneb Mahmood, TAVAKOLI AHMAD REZA, HEIDARI MOHAMMAD ALI. A Review of the Nature and Application of Analogy (Qias) in Comparative Jurisprudence and Iranian Law. FIGHE MOQARAN[Internet]. 2019;7(13 ):297-316. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/267002/en

IEEE: Copy

Mahmood Haghbejaneb, AHMAD REZA TAVAKOLI, and MOHAMMAD ALI HEIDARI, “A Review of the Nature and Application of Analogy (Qias) in Comparative Jurisprudence and Iranian Law,” FIGHE MOQARAN, vol. 7, no. 13 , pp. 297–316, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/267002/en

Related Journal Papers