Comparison of Three Composite Failure Criteria, using Airfoil Loading Test

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Pourabdollah V.; HAJI ABOUTALEBI F.; BEHESHTI H.; Rabieian H.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING Year:2018 | Volume:48 | Issue:2 (83) Page(s): 55-64

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

650

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparison of Three Composite Failure Criteria, using Airfoil Loading Test

Author(s)

Pourabdollah V. | HAJI ABOUTALEBI F. | BEHESHTI H. | Rabieian H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Damage and Fracture Criteria

Composites

Airfoil Loading Test

Finite Elements Method

Abstract

Regarding to the vast application of composite materials in the modern and advanced industries, accurately predicting the fracture and damage behavior of these materials is very important. Carrying out less and simple experiments leads to reducing the cost and time, therefore, designing and analyzing of the above mentioned materials need to find and applying the fracture and damage criteria. In the Iran country, these materials are more used for manufacturing the aircraft and for this reason, in this research airfoil piece is selected and simulated. For this aim, The Puck, Tsai-Wu, and Sun Damage and Fracture Criteria are implemented into the ABAQUS commercial software, employing an implicit subroutine. After the simulation of the airfoil, the damaged zones and critical points of the airfoil are predicted by the three mentioned criteria, results of the numerical simulations are compared with the experimental results and validated. Comparison of the numerical and experimental results reveals that the predicted results of the Puck's damage criterion is closer to the practical results and is more reliable for predicting the damage in the Airfoil Loading Test.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Pourabdollah, V., HAJI ABOUTALEBI, F., BEHESHTI, H., & Rabieian, H.. (2018). Comparison of Three Composite Failure Criteria, using Airfoil Loading Test. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 48(2 (83) ), 55-64. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/270005/en

Vancouver: Copy

Pourabdollah V., HAJI ABOUTALEBI F., BEHESHTI H., Rabieian H.. Comparison of Three Composite Failure Criteria, using Airfoil Loading Test. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING[Internet]. 2018;48(2 (83) ):55-64. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/270005/en

IEEE: Copy

V. Pourabdollah, F. HAJI ABOUTALEBI, H. BEHESHTI, and H. Rabieian, “Comparison of Three Composite Failure Criteria, using Airfoil Loading Test,” JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, vol. 48, no. 2 (83) , pp. 55–64, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/270005/en

Related Journal Papers