مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,937
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

MECHANIZED UREA TREATMENT OF WHEAT STRAW VERSUS THE CONVENTIONAL UREA TREATMENT METHOD

Pages

  141-154

Abstract

 The nutritional value of cereal straw can be increased using urea treatments as a source of ammonia. The conventional urea treatment process for cereal straw is a laborious and time-consuming task. It is essential to facilitate or eliminate part of the procedure with the use of machinery. This study examines the mechanical urea treatment of WHEAT STRAW and compares chemical components and digestibility of the treated straw with that treated conventionally. For mechanized urea treatment, a rectangular BALER fitted with a urea solution sprayer was used to treat the straw. The machine was connected to a tractor and used to prepare mechanized urea treated bales. At the same time, the conventional method was used to treat chopped straw. The samples were then compared with the mechanized treated straw. Results showed that treatment methods had no significant effect on the chemical compositions of DM, ash, ADL, DM, and CP. The effect of treatment method on other chemical compositions (NDF, ADF) and straw digestibility parameters (DMD, OMD and DOMD) was significant (P<0.05). The mean values of DMD, OMD and DOMD for untreated straw were 30.00%, 27.64%, and 25.92%. These values were 44.35%, 44.43%, and 41.46% for the conventional treatment method and 40.35%, 37.87%, and 35.51% for the mechanized method. The effective field capacity and effective material capacity of the mechanical urea treatment were 0.41 ha/h and 2.05 t/h, respectively. Results of this research also showed that mechanical urea treatments can be done under field conditions along with baling operations. This method of urea treatment can also increase the moisture content of the straw to the recommended range for urea treatment of WHEAT STRAW.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    YOUNESI ALAMOUTI, M., KHOSHTAGHAZA, M.H., & ZAHEDIFAR, M.. (2008). MECHANIZED UREA TREATMENT OF WHEAT STRAW VERSUS THE CONVENTIONAL UREA TREATMENT METHOD. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 9(1), 141-154. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/28176/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    YOUNESI ALAMOUTI M., KHOSHTAGHAZA M.H., ZAHEDIFAR M.. MECHANIZED UREA TREATMENT OF WHEAT STRAW VERSUS THE CONVENTIONAL UREA TREATMENT METHOD. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH[Internet]. 2008;9(1):141-154. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/28176/en

    IEEE: Copy

    M. YOUNESI ALAMOUTI, M.H. KHOSHTAGHAZA, and M. ZAHEDIFAR, “MECHANIZED UREA TREATMENT OF WHEAT STRAW VERSUS THE CONVENTIONAL UREA TREATMENT METHOD,” JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 141–154, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/28176/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    مرکز اطلاعات علمی SID
    strs
    دانشگاه امام حسین
    بنیاد ملی بازیهای رایانه ای
    کلید پژوه
    ایران سرچ
    ایران سرچ
    File Not Exists.
    Move to top