مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

307
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

117
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A STUDY OF DENSITOMETRY COMPARISON AMONG THREE RADIOGRAPHIC PROCESSING SOLUTIONS

Pages

  81-86

Abstract

 Background: The RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE accuracy depends on the X-ray film information visibility. Good visibility is found by good contrast. Radiation exposure parameters (kVp, mAs) and film processing conditions have impact on contrast. In dentistry radiography machines, exposure time and processing procedure are set by radiographer. No optimized exposure time and processing conditions may lead to incorrect diagnosis and re-exposure of the patient. Therefore, we studied the performance of the three different available PROCESSING SOLUTIONs with DENTAL X-RAY FILM. Materials and Methods: Dental intraoral E-speed films, size 2 (Kodak company, USA) were used in this study. These films were developed in a manual processor using three different brands of PROCESSING SOLUTION: 1) Taifsaz (Iran), 2) Darutasvir (Iran) and 3) Agfa (Germany) for temperatures of 25°C, 28°C and 30°C at the three different exposure times, 0.2 s, 0.25 s and 0.35 s. Performance was evaluated with respect to base plus fog, relative contrast and relative speed. Results: Darutasvir PROCESSING SOLUTION as the cheapest one showed higher base plus fog density at 25°C and 30°C than that of Taifsaz and Agfa solutions. Also, Darutasvir solution was found to have better relative contrast than that of the others, except for 30°C at 0.25 s. Relative speed was higher in Darutsavir solution than Agfa for 25°C at three exposure times used in this study, for 28°C at 0.2 s and for 30°C at 0.35 s. Taifsaz PROCESSING SOLUTION was in the second order with respect to tested conditions. Conclusion: Comparison among available X-ray film PROCESSING SOLUTIONs for different temperatures at different exposure times can help to maintain image quality while patient exposure and film cost are kept considerably low. 

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    CHANGIZI, V., JAZAYERI, E.S., & TALAEEPOUR, A.. (2006). A STUDY OF DENSITOMETRY COMPARISON AMONG THREE RADIOGRAPHIC PROCESSING SOLUTIONS. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 4(2), 81-86. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/286388/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    CHANGIZI V., JAZAYERI E.S., TALAEEPOUR A.. A STUDY OF DENSITOMETRY COMPARISON AMONG THREE RADIOGRAPHIC PROCESSING SOLUTIONS. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH[Internet]. 2006;4(2):81-86. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/286388/en

    IEEE: Copy

    V. CHANGIZI, E.S. JAZAYERI, and A. TALAEEPOUR, “A STUDY OF DENSITOMETRY COMPARISON AMONG THREE RADIOGRAPHIC PROCESSING SOLUTIONS,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 81–86, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/286388/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button