TECHNICAL EVALUATION AND ECONOMICAL COMPARISON OF CANOLA DIFFERENT HARVESTING SYSTEMS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SIEDLOO S.S.; RANJBAR E.; ABDIE S.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL KNOWLEDGE Year:2006 | Volume:16 | Issue:3 Page(s): 247-255

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,256

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

TECHNICAL EVALUATION AND ECONOMICAL COMPARISON OF CANOLA DIFFERENT HARVESTING SYSTEMS

Author(s)

SIEDLOO S.S. | RANJBAR E. | ABDIE S. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

COMBINEQ3

HARVESTINGQ2

RAPESEEDQ3

Abstract

On the basis of the investigations in different parts of the world, RAPESEED yield content (%) and seed loss (%) during HARVESTING operation are related to HARVESTING time and methods as well as seed moisture content. Evaluating and comparing of different types of HARVESTING systems and machines were the main objectives of this research. These methods from the view point of their impacts on seed loss, crop yield, oil content, total cost, effective field capacity and net benefit were studied. A randomized complete block design with four replications was used and the data was analysed. Treatments being direct HARVESTING with grain COMBINE: Double stage HARVESTING with conventional mover followed by threshing: Double stage HARVESTING with high clearance mover followed by threshing .Hand cutting followed by threshing. The results indicated that COMBINE HARVESTING caused maximum seed loss, therefore, it can be concluded that on time HARVESTING can reduce seed loss. Among these HARVESTING methods, direct combining had the highest effective field capacity and the lowest cost. The lowest effective field capacity and the highest cost belonged to hand cutting .According to the results, there was no significant difference between HARVESTING methods from the view point of net benefit. Therefore, any of the above HARVESTING methods best fitted to our farming system can be selected.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SIEDLOO, S.S., RANJBAR, E., & ABDIE, S.. (2006). TECHNICAL EVALUATION AND ECONOMICAL COMPARISON OF CANOLA DIFFERENT HARVESTING SYSTEMS. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL KNOWLEDGE, 16(3), 247-255. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/28822/en

Vancouver: Copy

SIEDLOO S.S., RANJBAR E., ABDIE S.. TECHNICAL EVALUATION AND ECONOMICAL COMPARISON OF CANOLA DIFFERENT HARVESTING SYSTEMS. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL KNOWLEDGE[Internet]. 2006;16(3):247-255. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/28822/en

IEEE: Copy

S.S. SIEDLOO, E. RANJBAR, and S. ABDIE, “TECHNICAL EVALUATION AND ECONOMICAL COMPARISON OF CANOLA DIFFERENT HARVESTING SYSTEMS,” JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL KNOWLEDGE, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 247–255, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/28822/en

Related Journal Papers