Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

425
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

262
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

AMNIOTIC MEMBRANE DRESSING VS CONVENTIONAL TOPICAL ANTIBIOTIC DRESSING IN HOSPITALIZED BURN PATIENTS

Pages

  66-70

Abstract

 Background: Different natural and synthetic materials were used for temporary BURN wound coverage; however, they are associated with disadvantages including high price which prohibit their widespread use, especially in developing countries. Among all, human AMNIOTIC MEMBRANE is the only easily available and cost free coverage. Its effects on BURN wounds have been studied in this survey.Methods: One-hundred and twenty four patients with 20-50% second and third degree BURNs and without any other disease were randomly assigned into two groups. The first 61 patients (control group) underwent traditional method of DRESSING with silver sulfadiazine and gauze which were changed twice a day. The remaining 63 patients underwent DRESSING with human AMNIOTIC MEMBRANE (amnion group), being changed every 3-4 days.Results: Patients in the control group had significantly lower albumin and needed more albumin infusion (231.80±234 gr. versus 111.51±143.82 gr.), received more blood transfusion (1.75± 2.52 bags versus 0.65± 1.18 bags), had significantly more intense pain and so received more narcotics than amnion group (7.97±12.85doses versus 3.84±7.56). Wound infection was higher in the control group (65.66% versus 46.91%) and so was the incidence of sepsis (24.62% versus 6.10%). There was 8.53% mortality in the control group versus 0% in the amnion group. All of the above-mentioned differences were statistically significant.Conclusions: AMNIOTIC MEMBRANE DRESSING in deep and more extensive BURNs leads to better homeostatic, immunologic and local results and because of its low price, its use is strongly recommended.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    MOHAMMADI, ALI AKBAR, RIAZI, H., HASHEMINASAB, M.J., SABET, B., MOHAMMADI, M.K., ABBASI, S., & AMINI, M.. (2009). AMNIOTIC MEMBRANE DRESSING VS CONVENTIONAL TOPICAL ANTIBIOTIC DRESSING IN HOSPITALIZED BURN PATIENTS. IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL (IRCMJ), 11(1), 66-70. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/292107/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MOHAMMADI ALI AKBAR, RIAZI H., HASHEMINASAB M.J., SABET B., MOHAMMADI M.K., ABBASI S., AMINI M.. AMNIOTIC MEMBRANE DRESSING VS CONVENTIONAL TOPICAL ANTIBIOTIC DRESSING IN HOSPITALIZED BURN PATIENTS. IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL (IRCMJ)[Internet]. 2009;11(1):66-70. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/292107/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ALI AKBAR MOHAMMADI, H. RIAZI, M.J. HASHEMINASAB, B. SABET, M.K. MOHAMMADI, S. ABBASI, and M. AMINI, “AMNIOTIC MEMBRANE DRESSING VS CONVENTIONAL TOPICAL ANTIBIOTIC DRESSING IN HOSPITALIZED BURN PATIENTS,” IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL (IRCMJ), vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 66–70, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/292107/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top