COMPARISON OF BACTERIOSTATIC SALINE AND BUFFERED LIDOCAINE EFFICACY IN CERVICAL ANESTHESIA IN DIAGNOSTIC CURRETAGE: A DOUBLE BLIND RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ALE YASIN ASHRAF; SHOEYBI G.; PADMEHR R.; ALAVI S.H.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: HAKIM RESEARCH JOURNAL Year:2004 | Volume:7 | Issue:3 Page(s): 32-37

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

702

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF BACTERIOSTATIC SALINE AND BUFFERED LIDOCAINE EFFICACY IN CERVICAL ANESTHESIA IN DIAGNOSTIC CURRETAGE: A DOUBLE BLIND RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Author(s)

ALE YASIN ASHRAF | SHOEYBI G. | PADMEHR R. | ALAVI S.H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CERVICAL ANESTHESIAQ4

SALINEQ4

LIDOCAINEQ4

PAINQ3

Abstract

Introduction: Usage of diagnostic curratage in clinical practice is very common. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of bacteriostatic SALINE and buffered LIDOCAINE in cervical aneasthesia. Methods: In this double-blind randomized clinical trial sixty patients who referred to gynecology ward of Shariati hospital, Tehran during 2001 - 2002 were randomly a Hocated into two groups. The severity of PAIN during dilatation and curratage (D&C) operation and 30 minutes after operation was assessed by 21-point Box Scale. Statistics analysis was performed by SPSS 11 software. Results: Severity of PAIN during D&C operation and 30 minutes after that was significantly much more in SALINE group than LIDOCAINE group (respectively, P=0.007, P=0. 001). Four patients in LIDOCAINE group and15 patients in SALINE group were excluded from the study because of confounding factors (such as complications or low efficiency). Conclusion: It seems that in Iran, bacteriostatic SALINE in cervical aneasthesia for the purpose of diagnostic curratage was not efficient.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ALE YASIN, ASHRAF, SHOEYBI, G., PADMEHR, R., & ALAVI, S.H.. (2004). COMPARISON OF BACTERIOSTATIC SALINE AND BUFFERED LIDOCAINE EFFICACY IN CERVICAL ANESTHESIA IN DIAGNOSTIC CURRETAGE: A DOUBLE BLIND RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL. HAKIM RESEARCH JOURNAL, 7(3), 32-37. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/29318/en

Vancouver: Copy

ALE YASIN ASHRAF, SHOEYBI G., PADMEHR R., ALAVI S.H.. COMPARISON OF BACTERIOSTATIC SALINE AND BUFFERED LIDOCAINE EFFICACY IN CERVICAL ANESTHESIA IN DIAGNOSTIC CURRETAGE: A DOUBLE BLIND RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL. HAKIM RESEARCH JOURNAL[Internet]. 2004;7(3):32-37. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/29318/en

IEEE: Copy

ASHRAF ALE YASIN, G. SHOEYBI, R. PADMEHR, and S.H. ALAVI, “COMPARISON OF BACTERIOSTATIC SALINE AND BUFFERED LIDOCAINE EFFICACY IN CERVICAL ANESTHESIA IN DIAGNOSTIC CURRETAGE: A DOUBLE BLIND RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL,” HAKIM RESEARCH JOURNAL, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 32–37, 2004, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/29318/en

Related Journal Papers