NIFEDIPINE COMPARED TO MAGNESIUM SULFATE FOR TREATING PRETERM LABOR

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NIKBAKHT ROSHAN; TAHERIMOGHADAM MAHIN; GHANE EE HOMA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine Year:2014 | Volume:12 | Issue:2 Page(s): 145-150

Download Full-Text

View:

532

Download:

204

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

NIFEDIPINE COMPARED TO MAGNESIUM SULFATE FOR TREATING PRETERM LABOR

Author(s)

NIKBAKHT ROSHAN | TAHERIMOGHADAM MAHIN | GHANE EE HOMA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

NIFEDIPINE

MAGNESIUM SULFATE

PRETERM LABOR

Abstract

Background: PRETERM LABOR is the leading cause of infant morbidity and mortality so it may be necessary to administer tocolytics for treatment of it.Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of MAGNESIUM SULFATE and NIFEDIPINE in the management of PRETERM LABOR.Materials and Methods: 100 women with documented PRETERM LABOR were randomly assigned to receive MAGNESIUM SULFATE (n=50) and NIFEDIPINE (n=50) as tocolytic therapy. Before tocolysis, patient did not receive any sedation. After tocolysis, if patient continued to have contractions, they received other tocolytic agents. The main outcome variables examined were days gain in utero, success rate and side effects.Results: Both drugs were equally effective in prevention of labor and delaying delivery >7 days, 56% vs. 64% in the NIFEDIPINE and MAGNESIUM SULFATE groups, and the days gain in utero was no statistically different in two groups. 6% of NIFEDIPINE group and 2% of MAGNESIUM SULFATE group required drug discontinuation due to severe symptoms. There were also no significant differences in maternal characteristics between two groups. The total success rate and side effects were similar in two groups.Conclusion: Oral NIFEDIPINE could be a suitable alternative for MAGNESIUM SULFATE with the same efficacy and side effects in the management of PRETERM LABOR.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

NIKBAKHT, ROSHAN, TAHERIMOGHADAM, MAHIN, & GHANE EE, HOMA. (2014). NIFEDIPINE COMPARED TO MAGNESIUM SULFATE FOR TREATING PRETERM LABOR. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE (IRANIAN JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE), 12(2), 145-150. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/296036/en

Vancouver: Copy

NIKBAKHT ROSHAN, TAHERIMOGHADAM MAHIN, GHANE EE HOMA. NIFEDIPINE COMPARED TO MAGNESIUM SULFATE FOR TREATING PRETERM LABOR. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE (IRANIAN JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE)[Internet]. 2014;12(2):145-150. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/296036/en

IEEE: Copy

ROSHAN NIKBAKHT, MAHIN TAHERIMOGHADAM, and HOMA GHANE EE, “NIFEDIPINE COMPARED TO MAGNESIUM SULFATE FOR TREATING PRETERM LABOR,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE (IRANIAN JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE), vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 145–150, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/296036/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops