مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

884
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

509
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS OF GLASS FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM

Pages

  315-323

Abstract

 Life cycle cost (LCC) analysis is currently a most valuable tool in the civil engineering construction industry and will be inevitable as resources become scarce. Selection of materials for fabricating components of any civil engineering structures will be based on LCC analysis. It is due to significant reduction in lifetime cost of construction, maintenance, repair and rehabilitation. In this paper, cost benefit analysis of three types of beam namely Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) reinforced, epoxy coated and steel reinforced beam was done. It includes the calculation of total lifetime cost, overall system cost and calculation the Net Present Value (NPV). Beams with over reinforced section and under reinforced section were considered in the cost analysis to have better understanding. A comparison was made between steel reinforced beam and GFRP reinforced beam to assess the benefits based on the economic aspects. From the results, it was found that good amount of cost-saving to an extent of 20% at initial stage and 40% with increase in age for GFRP reinforced beam over steel reinforced beam. The trend in variation of total cost for GFRP reinforced beam was consistent throughout its lifetime, whereas for steel reinforced beam and epoxy coated beam it was not so. Hence with the combined advantages of structural performance, serviceability, suitability for aggressive environments and economy, GFRP reinforced beam was strongly recommended from this study.

Multimedia

  • No record.

    • Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    DHINAKARAN, G., GOWRISANKAR, S., & JEYASEHAR, A.. (2016). LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS OF GLASS FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM. ASIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING (BUILDING AND HOUSING), 17(3), 315-323. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/299167/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    DHINAKARAN G., GOWRISANKAR S., JEYASEHAR A.. LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS OF GLASS FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM. ASIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING (BUILDING AND HOUSING)[Internet]. 2016;17(3):315-323. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/299167/en

    IEEE: Copy

    G. DHINAKARAN, S. GOWRISANKAR, and A. JEYASEHAR, “LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS OF GLASS FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM,” ASIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING (BUILDING AND HOUSING), vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 315–323, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/299167/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button