DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF CONVENTIONAL, DIGITAL AND CONE BEAM CT IN VERTICAL ROOT FRACTURE DETECTION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

VALIZADEH SOLMAZ; KHOSRAVI MARYAM; AZIZI ZEYNAB

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Endodontic Journal Year:2011 | Volume:6 | Issue:1 Page(s): 15-20

Download Full-Text

View:

484

Download:

295

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF CONVENTIONAL, DIGITAL AND CONE BEAM CT IN VERTICAL ROOT FRACTURE DETECTION

Author(s)

VALIZADEH SOLMAZ | KHOSRAVI MARYAM | AZIZI ZEYNAB | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

RADIOGRAPHY

VERTICAL ROOT FRACTURE

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: VERTICAL ROOT FRACTURE (VRF) is a common failure in endodontically treated teeth. Due to VRF’s poor prognosis, a reliable and valid detection method is critical for treatment planning. Conventional and digital radiographs are limited in VRF detection. Recently, Cone Beam CT (CBCT) system has been introduced. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of these three imaging modalities for VRF detection.MATERIALS & METHODS: One hundred and twenty extracted single-rooted teeth were selected and sectioned through cementoenamel junction. The roots were divided in two groups; group one consisted of 60 teeth with induced root fracture and group two had 60 teeth with no fracture. In the first group the crack was made by instron system. All samples were imaged by the three imaging modalities. Diagnostic accuracy was then compared with methylene blue dye detection method. Kappa was used for statistical analysis.RESULTS: CBCT showed the highest sensitivity (94.6%) and specificity (98.2%). Conventional RADIOGRAPHY and digital RADIOGRAPHY were not as accurate as CBCT.CONCLUSION: According to our study, CBCT seems to be better than conventional and digital RADIOGRAPHY in detecting VRF and provides the most reliable data in comparison with the two other modalities.

Cites

EFFECT OF OBJECT POSITION IN CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FIELD OF VIEW FOR DETECTION OF ROOT FRACTURES IN TEETH WITH INTRA-CANAL POSTS

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

VALIZADEH, SOLMAZ, KHOSRAVI, MARYAM, & AZIZI, ZEYNAB. (2011). DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF CONVENTIONAL, DIGITAL AND CONE BEAM CT IN VERTICAL ROOT FRACTURE DETECTION. IRANIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL (IEJ), 6(1), 15-20. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/302744/en

Vancouver: Copy

VALIZADEH SOLMAZ, KHOSRAVI MARYAM, AZIZI ZEYNAB. DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF CONVENTIONAL, DIGITAL AND CONE BEAM CT IN VERTICAL ROOT FRACTURE DETECTION. IRANIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL (IEJ)[Internet]. 2011;6(1):15-20. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/302744/en

IEEE: Copy

SOLMAZ VALIZADEH, MARYAM KHOSRAVI, and ZEYNAB AZIZI, “DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF CONVENTIONAL, DIGITAL AND CONE BEAM CT IN VERTICAL ROOT FRACTURE DETECTION,” IRANIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL (IEJ), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 15–20, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/302744/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops