CONTEMPORARY METHODS FOR EVALUATING COMPLEX PROJECT PROPOSALS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

THAMHAIN HANS J.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL Year:2013 | Volume:9 | Issue:9 Page(s): 1-14

Download Full-Text

View:

251

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CONTEMPORARY METHODS FOR EVALUATING COMPLEX PROJECT PROPOSALS

Author(s)

THAMHAIN HANS J. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PROJECT EVALUATION AND SELECTION

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

TEAM LEADERSHIP

TECHNOLOGY

DECISION MAKING

RATIONAL

JUDGMENTAL

Abstract

The ability to evaluate project proposals, assessing future success, and organizational value is critical to overall business performance for most enterprises. Yet, predicting project success is difficult and often unreliable. A four-year field study shows that the effectiveness of available methods for evaluating and selecting large, complex project depends on the specific project type, organizational culture, and managerial skills. This paper examines the strength and limitations of various evaluation methods. It also shows that, especially in complex project situations, the decision-making process has to go beyond the application of just analytical methods, but has to incorporate both quantitative and qualitative measures into a combined RATIONAL JUDGMENTAL evaluation process. Equally important, the evaluation process must be effectively linked among functional support groups and with senior management in order to strategically align the project proposal and to unify the evaluation team and stakeholder community behind the mission objectives. All of this requires leadership and managerial skills in planning, organizing, and communicating. The paper suggests specific leadership actions, organizational conditions, and managerial processes for evaluating complex project proposals toward future value and success.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

THAMHAIN, HANS J.. (2013). CONTEMPORARY METHODS FOR EVALUATING COMPLEX PROJECT PROPOSALS. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 9(9), 1-14. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/309946/en

Vancouver: Copy

THAMHAIN HANS J.. CONTEMPORARY METHODS FOR EVALUATING COMPLEX PROJECT PROPOSALS. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL[Internet]. 2013;9(9):1-14. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/309946/en

IEEE: Copy

HANS J. THAMHAIN, “CONTEMPORARY METHODS FOR EVALUATING COMPLEX PROJECT PROPOSALS,” JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1–14, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/309946/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops