مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

118
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

83
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparative Assessment of Tear Function Tests, Tear Osmolarity, and Conjunctival Impression Cytology between Patients with Pterygium and Healthy Eyes

Pages

  12-17

Abstract

 Purpose: To compare histologic abnormalities of tear film and Tear Osmolarity between normal eyes and eyes with Pterygium. Methods: This was a prospective, hospital‑ based, case– control study involving 95 patients (65 men, 30 women) with unilateral Pterygium. The Tear Meniscus Height (TMH), Schirmer’; s Test‑ 1 (SCH‑ 1) score, Rose Bengal Staining (RBS) score, tear film breakup time (TBUT), Tear Osmolarity (TO), and Conjunctival Impression Cytology (CIC) were assessed in both eyes. The Chi‑ square and Student’ s t‑ tests were used to compare the results between the two groups. P values <0. 05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The mean patient age was 50. 9 years, with the largest age group being the 45– 55 year‑ old bracket across both genders. Most patients (82. 1%) had nasal Pterygium, and 80% were involved in outside activities. The mean assessment values in the case and control groups were as follows: TMH, 0. 21 vs. 0. 24 mm; SCH‑ 1, 13. 2 vs. 17. 8 mm; RBS, 4. 38 vs. 2. 51 points; TBUT, 8. 7 vs. 13. 2 seconds; TO, 306 vs. 299 mOsm/L (P < 0. 001 in all cases). The proportions of abnormal assessment values in the case and control groups were as follows: TMH, 82. 1% vs. 3. 16%; SCH‑ 1, 20% vs. 2. 1%; RBS, 30. 53% vs. 4. 22%; TBUT, 61. 05% vs. 6. 3%; TO, 10. 52% vs. 1. 05%; CIC, 33. 7% vs. 7. 37% (P < 0. 05 for all comparisons) Conclusion: This study showed that the quantity and quality of tear film, as well as the number of goblet cells, decreased, but the Tear Osmolarity increased in eyes with Pterygium. Furthermore, the TMH, RBS results, TBUT, and CIC have more precise state of the patient’ s tear condition with the disease of the Pterygium.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SAFARZADEH, MASOUD, Heidari, Sahel, Azizzadeh, Parvin, SHEIBANI, KOUROSH, NASSIRI, NADER, HEIDARI, LALEH, & AGHATAHERI, SATTAR. (2019). Comparative Assessment of Tear Function Tests, Tear Osmolarity, and Conjunctival Impression Cytology between Patients with Pterygium and Healthy Eyes. JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMIC AND VISION RESEARCH, 14(1), 12-17. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/311747/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SAFARZADEH MASOUD, Heidari Sahel, Azizzadeh Parvin, SHEIBANI KOUROSH, NASSIRI NADER, HEIDARI LALEH, AGHATAHERI SATTAR. Comparative Assessment of Tear Function Tests, Tear Osmolarity, and Conjunctival Impression Cytology between Patients with Pterygium and Healthy Eyes. JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMIC AND VISION RESEARCH[Internet]. 2019;14(1):12-17. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/311747/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MASOUD SAFARZADEH, Sahel Heidari, Parvin Azizzadeh, KOUROSH SHEIBANI, NADER NASSIRI, LALEH HEIDARI, and SATTAR AGHATAHERI, “Comparative Assessment of Tear Function Tests, Tear Osmolarity, and Conjunctival Impression Cytology between Patients with Pterygium and Healthy Eyes,” JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMIC AND VISION RESEARCH, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 12–17, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/311747/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button