FOREARM BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN COMPARE WITH STANDARD METHOD

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

FALAHI FARAMARZ; MOHAMMAD HOSSEINZADEH DAVATGARI R.; AZIMI S.E.; FAGHIHZADEH S.; SADEGHIAN SAEID

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Daneshvar Medicine: Basic and Clinical Research Journal Year:2008 | Volume:15 | Issue:76 Page(s): 65-74

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,464

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

FOREARM BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN COMPARE WITH STANDARD METHOD

Author(s)

Keywords

FOREARMQ3

BLOOD PRESSUREQ3

MEASUREMENTQ2

RADIAL PULSEQ3

Abstract

Introduction: BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT (BPM) is the most common useful part of physical examination and patient assessment. And almost all physician and most of nurses use it for this mean. There are several methods for BPM and the most usefully of them is the standard method, by use of stethoscope and sphygmomanometer via brachial artery. When the upper arm (area from shoulder to elbow) is inaccessible and/or a standard-sized BLOOD PRESSURE cuff does not fit, some healthcare workers use the FOREARM to measure BLOOD PRESSURE. Nevertheless evidence supporting this practice is limited.Materials & Methods: In this study 80 patients that admitted to Mustafa Khomeini hospital were evaluated by over all 320 times MEASUREMENTs to compare FOREARM BPM and standard method (half of them by new method and the rest by standard method).Results: In this study FOREARM mean diastolic BP was 75.2±11.6 in compare with 74.1±13.3 in standard BPM (correlation coefficient: 0.83, p<0.000). Also by paired T test, there was no significant difference between these MEASUREMENTs (p<0.223). Mean systolic BP in FOREARM BPM and standard method were 127.8±27.8 and 129.5±25.6 consequently (correlation coefficient: 0.95, p<0.000). Also there was no significant difference between them by paired t- test (p<0.094).Conclusion: These findings showed that FOREARM BPM can successfully used instead of standard method at least in some situations that upper arm or suitable cuff are inaccessible.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

FALAHI, FARAMARZ, MOHAMMAD HOSSEINZADEH DAVATGARI, R., AZIMI, S.E., FAGHIHZADEH, S., & SADEGHIAN, SAEID. (2008). FOREARM BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN COMPARE WITH STANDARD METHOD. DANESHVAR MEDICINE, 15(76), 65-74. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/31186/en

Vancouver: Copy

FALAHI FARAMARZ, MOHAMMAD HOSSEINZADEH DAVATGARI R., AZIMI S.E., FAGHIHZADEH S., SADEGHIAN SAEID. FOREARM BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN COMPARE WITH STANDARD METHOD. DANESHVAR MEDICINE[Internet]. 2008;15(76):65-74. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/31186/en

IEEE: Copy

FARAMARZ FALAHI, R. MOHAMMAD HOSSEINZADEH DAVATGARI, S.E. AZIMI, S. FAGHIHZADEH, and SAEID SADEGHIAN, “FOREARM BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN COMPARE WITH STANDARD METHOD,” DANESHVAR MEDICINE, vol. 15, no. 76, pp. 65–74, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/31186/en

Related Journal Papers