NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE USE OF LEXICAL BUNDLES IN DISCUSSION SECTION OF POLITICAL SCIENCE ARTICLES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SAFARZADEH MOHAMMAD MEISAM; MONFARED ABBAS; SARFEJU MOHAMAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies Year:2013 | Volume:5 | Issue:2 Page(s): 137-166

Download Full-Text

View:

336

Download:

106

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE USE OF LEXICAL BUNDLES IN DISCUSSION SECTION OF POLITICAL SCIENCE ARTICLES

Author(s)

SAFARZADEH MOHAMMAD MEISAM | MONFARED ABBAS | SARFEJU MOHAMAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

LEXICAL BUNDLES

ESP

NATIVISM

NON-NATIVISM

Abstract

The study of LEXICAL BUNDLES, among types of text analysis, is gaining importance over the others in the last century. The present study employed a frequency-based analysis approach to the use of LEXICAL BUNDLES. The discussion section of 60 political science articles, with corpora around 253,063 words were investigated in three aspects of structure, form, and function of LEXICAL BUNDLES. The present study selected its data pool out of scholarly articles from qualified journals in the field of political sciences. One part of the data pool was made up of 30 articles written by American native speakers. The second half of the data comprised the 30 articles written by Iranian scholars in political sciences. The findings showed that native and Persian-speaking writers employed the same forms of LEXICAL BUNDLES, and there were significant differences concerning the nativeness and functions. Bearing in mind the findings of the present study, material developers would think of the possibility of the addition of lexical clusters into the materials. It can similarly be valuable for the development of the second language writing strategies, for those who need to write in academic contexts ESPecially political contexts.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

. (2013). NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE USE OF LEXICAL BUNDLES IN DISCUSSION SECTION OF POLITICAL SCIENCE ARTICLES. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED LANGUAGE STUDIES, 5(2), 137-166. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/315045/en

Vancouver: Copy

. NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE USE OF LEXICAL BUNDLES IN DISCUSSION SECTION OF POLITICAL SCIENCE ARTICLES. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED LANGUAGE STUDIES[Internet]. 2013;5(2):137-166. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/315045/en

IEEE: Copy

, “NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE USE OF LEXICAL BUNDLES IN DISCUSSION SECTION OF POLITICAL SCIENCE ARTICLES,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED LANGUAGE STUDIES, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 137–166, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/315045/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops