مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

315
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

154
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

L1 GLOSSING AND LEXICAL INFERENCING: EVALUATION OF THE OVERARCHING ISSUE OF L1 LEXICALIZATION

Pages

  1-24

Abstract

 This empirical study reports on a cross-linguistic analysis of the overarching issue of L1 LEXICALIZATION regarding two (non) - interventionist approaches to vocabulary teaching.Participants were seventy four juniors at the Islamic Azad University, Roudehen Branch in Tehran. The investigation pursued (i) the impact of the provided (non) -interventionist treatments on both sets of (non) -lexicalized items relatrd to the interrelationships between the experimental and the control groups (ii) the importance of the cross-linguistic issue of L1 LEXICALIZATION in reference to the significance of the difference between the scores obtained for the two sets of (non) - lexicalized items within each group distinctively. The results of the independentt -test between the two groups indicated a significant difference between the experimental and control groups dealing with both sets of vocabulary items. The obtained findings related to the pairedt -test demonstrated a significant difference between the scores achieved for the two sets of words in favor of lexicalized items in the interventionist group. The gained results of the non-interventionist INFERENCING group demonstrated that the learners had greater familiarity with lexicalized items at pre-testing, and they were more successful in learning lexicalized items compared with non-lexicalized ones at post-testing. However, no significant difference was found regarding the gain scores for the two sets of (non) -lexicalized items in the non-interventionist group.These findings are discussed both theoretically and practically for L2 lexical representation and instruction.

Multimedia

  • No record.

    • Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    GOLAGHAEI, N., & SADIGHI, F.. (2013). L1 GLOSSING AND LEXICAL INFERENCING: EVALUATION OF THE OVERARCHING ISSUE OF L1 LEXICALIZATION. TEACHING ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE QUARTERL (JOURNAL OF TEACHING LANGUAGE SKILLS), 4(4 (69/4)), 1-24. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/318063/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    GOLAGHAEI N., SADIGHI F.. L1 GLOSSING AND LEXICAL INFERENCING: EVALUATION OF THE OVERARCHING ISSUE OF L1 LEXICALIZATION. TEACHING ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE QUARTERL (JOURNAL OF TEACHING LANGUAGE SKILLS)[Internet]. 2013;4(4 (69/4)):1-24. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/318063/en

    IEEE: Copy

    N. GOLAGHAEI, and F. SADIGHI, “L1 GLOSSING AND LEXICAL INFERENCING: EVALUATION OF THE OVERARCHING ISSUE OF L1 LEXICALIZATION,” TEACHING ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE QUARTERL (JOURNAL OF TEACHING LANGUAGE SKILLS), vol. 4, no. 4 (69/4), pp. 1–24, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/318063/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button