COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT METHODS OF COLON CLEANSING FOR AFTERNOON-COLONOSCOPY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BAGHBANI KOBRA; SHOKRY SHIRVANI JAVAD; TAHERI HASSAN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine Year:2014 | Volume:5 | Issue:3 Page(s): 162-166

Download Full-Text

View:

265

Download:

123

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT METHODS OF COLON CLEANSING FOR AFTERNOON-COLONOSCOPY

Author(s)

BAGHBANI KOBRA | SHOKRY SHIRVANI JAVAD | TAHERI HASSAN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

COLONOSCOPY

COLON

CLEANSING

PEG SOLUTION

Abstract

Background: The appropriate COLON CLEANSING is a major determinant of quality of COLONOSCOPY. This prospective randomized study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the morning (AM) PEG (polyethylene glycol) solution to previous-evening (PM) PEG SOLUTION for the afternoon COLONOSCOPY.Methods: This comparative study compared the AM to PM prep for afternoon outpatient COLONOSCOPY. The subjects randomly received PEG PM dose; 4 liters of water plus 4 pack PEG powder at 6 PM before COLONOSCOPY (250 ml every 15 min) or AM (the same dose solution at 6 AM on the day of COLONOSCOPY). The preparation and COLONOSCOPY quality, PEG side effects, sleep quality, lesion detection, flush need and suction fluid were compared in these two groups.Results: One hundred seven cases received AM prep and 102 received PM prep. The COLON prep was adequate in 94.4% in AM group and in 90.2% cases in PM group (P=0.2). The incidence of adverse events in these two groups was similar. Sleep quality and the need for flush was lower in the AM group (P=0.004 and P=0.03). The mean volume of suction fluid was higher in the AM group (P=0.01). The detected lesions were similar between the two groups. Adequate prep was associated with lower flush need in AM group (P=0.001).Conclusion: AM and PM PEG SOLUTIONs were clinically equivalent with CLEANSING efficacy and side effect and lesion detection. AM group was associated with a better sleep quality and less flush need, but more suction fluid.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BAGHBANI, KOBRA, SHOKRY SHIRVANI, JAVAD, & TAHERI, HASSAN. (2014). COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT METHODS OF COLON CLEANSING FOR AFTERNOON-COLONOSCOPY. CASPIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 5(3), 162-166. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/323363/en

Vancouver: Copy

BAGHBANI KOBRA, SHOKRY SHIRVANI JAVAD, TAHERI HASSAN. COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT METHODS OF COLON CLEANSING FOR AFTERNOON-COLONOSCOPY. CASPIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE[Internet]. 2014;5(3):162-166. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/323363/en

IEEE: Copy

KOBRA BAGHBANI, JAVAD SHOKRY SHIRVANI, and HASSAN TAHERI, “COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT METHODS OF COLON CLEANSING FOR AFTERNOON-COLONOSCOPY,” CASPIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 162–166, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/323363/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops