مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

167
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

69
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Evaluation and Statistical Validation of Black-Spots Identification Methods

Pages

  1-15

Abstract

 Despite the identification of crash hotspots as a first step of the roads Safety management process, with various effective black spots identification (HSID) methods, only a few researchers have compared the performance of these methods; also it is not clear which test is the most consistent in the black-spots identification. In this research, seven commonly applied HSID methods (accident frequency (AF), PIARC coefficient based equivalent property damage only (EPDO), P-value (Islamic Republic of Iran Ministry Roads and Urban development), accident rate (AR), combined criteria, empirical Bayes (EB), societal risk-based) were compared against six robust and informative quantitative evaluation criteria (site consistency test, method consistency test, total rank differences test, total score test, sensitivity test and specificity test). These tests evaluate each method performance in a variety of areas, such as efficiency in identifying sites that show consistently poor Safety performance, reliability in identifying the same black spots in subsequent time periods. To evaluate the HSID methods, three years of crash data from the Kerman state were used. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method has been used for determination the importance coefficients of evaluation tests and as a result, showed that the total rank differences test is the most appropriate test. The quantitative evaluation tests showed that the EB method performs better than the other HSID method. Test results highlight that the EB method is the most consistent and reliable method for identifying priority investigation locations. Overall, this result is consistent with the results of previous studies. The societal risk-based method performed worst in the all of the tests. It should be noted that advantages associated with the EB method were based on crash data from one of the road in Iran country, so the relative performances of HSID methods may change when using other crash data. However, the study results are consistent with earlier findings.

Multimedia

  • No record.
  • Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Karimi Maskooni, Esmaeil, & HAGHIGHI, FARSHIDREZA. (2018). Evaluation and Statistical Validation of Black-Spots Identification Methods. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, 6(1 (21)), 1-15. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/332969/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Karimi Maskooni Esmaeil, HAGHIGHI FARSHIDREZA. Evaluation and Statistical Validation of Black-Spots Identification Methods. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING[Internet]. 2018;6(1 (21)):1-15. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/332969/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Esmaeil Karimi Maskooni, and FARSHIDREZA HAGHIGHI, “Evaluation and Statistical Validation of Black-Spots Identification Methods,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, vol. 6, no. 1 (21), pp. 1–15, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/332969/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button