Stakeholder Participation for Legitimate Priority Setting: A Checklist

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Jansen Maarten P.M.; BALTUSSEN ROB; Baeroe Kristine

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: International Journal of Health Policy and Management Year:2018 | Volume:7 | Issue:11 Page(s): 973-976

Download Full-Text

View:

205

Download:

125

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Stakeholder Participation for Legitimate Priority Setting: A Checklist

Author(s)

Jansen Maarten P.M. | BALTUSSEN ROB | Baeroe Kristine | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Priority Setting

Accountability for Reasonableness

Legitimacy

Stakeholder Participation

Abstract

Accountable decision-makers are required to legitimize their Priority Setting decisions in health to members of society. In this perspective we stress the point that fair, legitimate processes should reflect efforts of authorities to treat all stakeholders as moral equals in terms of providing all people with well-justified, reasonable reasons to endorse the decisions. We argue there is a special moral concern for being accountable to those who are potentially adversely affected by decisions. Health authorities need to operationalize this requirement into real world action. In this perspective, we operationalize five key steps in doing so, in terms of (i) proactively identifying potentially adversely affected stakeholders; (ii) comprehensively including them in the decision-making process; (iii) ensuring meaningful participation; (iv) communication of recommendations or decisions; and (v) the organization of evaluation and appeal mechanisms. Health authorities are advised to use a checklist in the form of 29 reflective questions, aligned with these five key steps, to assist them in the practical organization of legitimate Priority Setting in healthcare.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

Jansen, Maarten P.M., BALTUSSEN, ROB, & Baeroe, Kristine. (2018). Stakeholder Participation for Legitimate Priority Setting: A Checklist. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 7(11), 973-976. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/338625/en

Vancouver: Copy

Jansen Maarten P.M., BALTUSSEN ROB, Baeroe Kristine. Stakeholder Participation for Legitimate Priority Setting: A Checklist. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT[Internet]. 2018;7(11):973-976. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/338625/en

IEEE: Copy

Maarten P.M. Jansen, ROB BALTUSSEN, and Kristine Baeroe, “Stakeholder Participation for Legitimate Priority Setting: A Checklist,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 973–976, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/338625/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops