COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN ELECTIVE OVARIOHYSTERECTOMY IN DOGS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BAKHTIARI JALAL; MOKARAM S.; KHALAJ ALI REZA; SHARIFI DAVOUD; ASHRAFI HALAN J.; TAVAKOLI AZIN

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Veterinary Research Year:2008 | Volume:63 | Issue:3 Page(s): 147-151

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,030

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN ELECTIVE OVARIOHYSTERECTOMY IN DOGS

Author(s)

Keywords

LAPAROSCOPYQ3

DOGSQ3

OVARIOHYSTERECTOMYQ3

PAIN ASSESSMENTQ2

Abstract

Laparoscopic and open OVARIOHYSTERECTOMY were compared for the following parameters: surgical time, incision length, suture number, saturation of oxyhemoglobin (SPO2), heart rate, complications, CBC findings, Melbourne pain scale (MPS) and gross pathology. MPS pain scores were evaluated using Mann-whitney U Test. Other parameters were evaluated using Student’s t test. There were no significant differences in SPo2, heart rate, surgical complications, MPS pain scores and CBC, whereas the blood loss was significantly (P<0.05) lower and the total incision length and suture number was less in laparoscopic group. There were less surgical time and more extensive adhesion formation in the open technique. The laparoscopic OVARIOHYSTERECTOMY is a potentially safe surgical technique in DOGS and leads to less adhesion formation that may result in pain of adhesion sites and movement limitation.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BAKHTIARI, JALAL, MOKARAM, S., KHALAJ, ALI REZA, SHARIFI, DAVOUD, ASHRAFI HALAN, J., & TAVAKOLI, AZIN. (2008). COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN ELECTIVE OVARIOHYSTERECTOMY IN DOGS. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 63(3), 147-151. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/35161/en

Vancouver: Copy

BAKHTIARI JALAL, MOKARAM S., KHALAJ ALI REZA, SHARIFI DAVOUD, ASHRAFI HALAN J., TAVAKOLI AZIN. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN ELECTIVE OVARIOHYSTERECTOMY IN DOGS. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH[Internet]. 2008;63(3):147-151. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/35161/en

IEEE: Copy

JALAL BAKHTIARI, S. MOKARAM, ALI REZA KHALAJ, DAVOUD SHARIFI, J. ASHRAFI HALAN, and AZIN TAVAKOLI, “COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN ELECTIVE OVARIOHYSTERECTOMY IN DOGS,” JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 147–151, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/35161/en

Related Journal Papers