COMPARISON OF SUCCESS RATE OF THREE METHODS OF NASOGASTRIC INTUBATION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GHAEMI M.; BAGHERI HOSSEIN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Koomesh Year:2011 | Volume:12 | Issue:4 (40) Page(s): 402-407

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,869

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF SUCCESS RATE OF THREE METHODS OF NASOGASTRIC INTUBATION

Author(s)

GHAEMI M. | BAGHERI HOSSEIN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

NASOGASTRIC INTUBATIONQ2

GASTROINTESTINAL- METHODSQ2

INTUBATION –ADVERSE EFFECTSQ2

ANESTHESIAQ3

Abstract

Introduction: Insertion of a nasogastric tube (NGT) sometimes will be difficult in patients who are anesthetized or comatose. The tube entraps in the pyriform sinuses and, thus, coils inside the oral cavity. Several methods have been offered to increase the success rate of the procedure. The aim of this study was to compare the success rate of three methods of NGT insertion.Materials and Methods: In a prospective clinical trial study, 162 patients who needed NGT insertion were randomly divided into three groups: Contorl, D and M groups. In the control group, insertion of the tube was done with the head of the patient in the normal position. In D and M groups, NGT were conducted through the pharynx towards the esophagus by digital assistance and by Magills forceps, respectively.Results: the success rates in the control, D and M groups were 70%, 94% and 81%, respectively. The differences between D group and the control and M groups were significant.Conclusion: NGT insertion by digital assistance is recommended as first choice forNASOGASTRIC INTUBATION in anesthetized and comatose patients due to facility and low cost.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GHAEMI, M., & BAGHERI, HOSSEIN. (2011). COMPARISON OF SUCCESS RATE OF THREE METHODS OF NASOGASTRIC INTUBATION. KOOMESH, 12(4 (40)), 402-407. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/357613/en

Vancouver: Copy

GHAEMI M., BAGHERI HOSSEIN. COMPARISON OF SUCCESS RATE OF THREE METHODS OF NASOGASTRIC INTUBATION. KOOMESH[Internet]. 2011;12(4 (40)):402-407. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/357613/en

IEEE: Copy

M. GHAEMI, and HOSSEIN BAGHERI, “COMPARISON OF SUCCESS RATE OF THREE METHODS OF NASOGASTRIC INTUBATION,” KOOMESH, vol. 12, no. 4 (40), pp. 402–407, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/357613/en

Related Journal Papers