مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

926
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

2

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE ACCURACY COMPARISON OF DIRECT DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY (DDR) AND CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY IN DETECTING CHEMICALLY CREATED LESIONS

Pages

  0-0

Abstract

 Background and Aim: Diagnosis of periapical pathology is of paramount importance in enabling the clinician to provide immediate and appropriate dental treatment. Both intraoral DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY and film RADIOGRAPHY are used to detect periapical pathology. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of DIGITAL radiographic imaging with CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY in detecting chemically created lesions.Materials and Methods: For conducting this experimental study one cow cadaver mandibular Jaw was used. After building four 1×1 cm2 pools at first molar areas, 35% Hydrochloric acid solution used to create chemically lesions. The designed time for chemically lesions was 4, 12, 24 and 36 hrs following acid exposure. Then, 1 DIGITAL and 1 CONVENTIONAL image with E-Speed film was taken from each half-jaw and images evaluated by five examiners. Wilcoxon signed Ranks test used for statistical analysis.Results: The results of this study showed that diagnosis were more precise in detecting lesions with RVG than CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.05).Conclusion: Regarding the acceptable quality of DIGITAL radiographs comparing to CONVENTIONAL radiographs we suggest using this method for detecting bone lesions.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    TABRIZIZADEH, MAHDI, ABRISHAM, SEYYED MOHAMMAD, & YAZDANI, ELAHE. (2011). THE ACCURACY COMPARISON OF DIRECT DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY (DDR) AND CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY IN DETECTING CHEMICALLY CREATED LESIONS. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 29(1 (87)), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/358161/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    TABRIZIZADEH MAHDI, ABRISHAM SEYYED MOHAMMAD, YAZDANI ELAHE. THE ACCURACY COMPARISON OF DIRECT DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY (DDR) AND CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY IN DETECTING CHEMICALLY CREATED LESIONS. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE[Internet]. 2011;29(1 (87)):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/358161/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MAHDI TABRIZIZADEH, SEYYED MOHAMMAD ABRISHAM, and ELAHE YAZDANI, “THE ACCURACY COMPARISON OF DIRECT DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY (DDR) AND CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY IN DETECTING CHEMICALLY CREATED LESIONS,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, vol. 29, no. 1 (87), pp. 0–0, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/358161/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top