Comparison of Epistemological system's with Methodological Benchmarks in Spatial Planning

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Mokhtari Karchegani Ali; TAVAKOLI MORTEZA; AHMADIPOUR ZAHRA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Geography and Development Year:2020 | Volume:18 | Issue:59 Page(s): 185-210

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

395

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparison of Epistemological system's with Methodological Benchmarks in Spatial Planning

Author(s)

Mokhtari Karchegani Ali | TAVAKOLI MORTEZA | AHMADIPOUR ZAHRA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Epistemology schoolsQ1

Classical rationalityQ1

Postmodern relativismQ1

Pluralism-critical rationalityQ1

Spatial planningQ2

Abstract

The subject of paper is the study of the epistemology of Spatial planning (Classical rationality, Postmodern relativism and Pluralism-critical rationality). The main purpose of this paper is to explain the pluralist-critical rationality in Spatial planning. First, it is necessary to determine the position and rationality ratio of Spatial planning in order to achieve this goal. Then, three epistemological approaches to Spatial planning of Classical rationality, Postmodern relativism and pluralist-critical rationality have been critically analyzed and comparative comparisons. Research findings show that the concept of rationality in Spatial planning is wider than its Cartesian meaning, and postmodern relativists attribute Classical rationality to total rationality. Also, the epistemic contradictions in Postmodern relativism distract Spatial planning from its collective, practical and realistic nature. In contrast, the pluralist-critique approach has been able to resolve the weaknesses of Classical rationality and respond to the critique of Postmodern relativism toward rationality. This epistemic approach holds that modern rationality is based on a comprehensive and argument capacity that allows the acceptance and aggregation of the ideas, goals and values of Spatial planning stakeholders at different levels of space. All this process takes place within the framework of an open and democratic environment that can convince stakeholders that they will reach an informed consent about the public interest.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Mokhtari Karchegani, Ali, TAVAKOLI, MORTEZA, & AHMADIPOUR, ZAHRA. (2020). Comparison of Epistemological system's with Methodological Benchmarks in Spatial Planning. GEOGRAPHY AND DEVELOPMENT, 18(59 ), 185-210. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/359427/en

Vancouver: Copy

Mokhtari Karchegani Ali, TAVAKOLI MORTEZA, AHMADIPOUR ZAHRA. Comparison of Epistemological system's with Methodological Benchmarks in Spatial Planning. GEOGRAPHY AND DEVELOPMENT[Internet]. 2020;18(59 ):185-210. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/359427/en

IEEE: Copy

Ali Mokhtari Karchegani, MORTEZA TAVAKOLI, and ZAHRA AHMADIPOUR, “Comparison of Epistemological system's with Methodological Benchmarks in Spatial Planning,” GEOGRAPHY AND DEVELOPMENT, vol. 18, no. 59 , pp. 185–210, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/359427/en

Related Journal Papers